Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nona Naderi

dblp:57/10200 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-1272-7640ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 56% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 44%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue management
0.912025
Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › pragmatics
pragmatic reasoning
0.912025
Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
collaborative dialogue
0.312025
Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog · EMNLP 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology
biomedical text mining
0.112011
OrganismTagger: detection, normalization and grounding of organism entities in biomedical documents · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

rational speech act · 0.9rate-distortion theory · 0.9rule-based method · 0.1machine learning · 0.1lexical methods · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Assessing the Difficulty of Inference Types in Natural Language Inference for Clinical Trials
abstract
International audience
Mathilde Aguiar, Pierre Zweigenbaum, Nona Naderi
LREC3
2025 Collaborative Rational Speech Act: Pragmatic Reasoning for Multi-Turn Dialog
abstract
As AI systems take on collaborative roles, they must reason about shared goals and beliefs-not just generate fluent language.The Rational Speech Act (RSA) framework offers a principled approach to pragmatic reasoning, but existing extensions face challenges in scaling to multi-turn, collaborative scenarios.In this paper, we introduce Collaborative Rational Speech Act (CRSA), an information-theoretic (IT) extension of RSA that models multi-turn dialog by optimizing a gain function adapted from rate-distortion theory.This gain is an extension of the gain model that is maximized in the original RSA model but takes into account the scenario in which both agents in a conversation have private information and produce utterances conditioned on the dialog.We demonstrate the effectiveness of CRSA on referential games and template-based doctor-patient dialogs in the medical domain.Empirical results show that CRSA yields more consistent, interpretable, and collaborative behavior than existing baselines, paving the way for more pragmatically competent language agents.
Lautaro Estienne, Gabriel Ben Zenou, Nona Naderi, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung, Pablo Piantanida
EMNLP3
2024 Reproducibility in Named Entity Recognition: A Case Study Analysis
abstract
Information extraction from text is essential in data science and artificial intelligence, especially with the increase in the number of scientific articles. Robust methods are needed to structure texts and highlight key information. Named Entity Recognition (NER) identifies and classifies major elements in text, aiding in dataset structuring and tagging.Under the FAIRClinical and ShareFAIR projects, we aimed to extract information from clinical trial publications using NER models. These models have been successfully used for clinical trial information extraction. In this paper, we report on the difficulties met in reusing existing NER solutions, focusing on mandatory replicability. This paper discusses the challenges faced in replicating a notable study, the difficulties encountered and lessons learned. It compares our experiment with the feedback provided by the literature and draws conclusions.
Carlos Cuevas Villarmin, Sarah Cohen Boulakia, Nona Naderi
e-Science3
2017 Computational Argumentation Quality Assessment in Natural Language
abstract
Henning Wachsmuth, Nona Naderi, Yufang Hou, Yonatan Bilu, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Tim Alberdingk Thijm, Graeme Hirst, Benno Stein. Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers. 2017.
Henning Wachsmuth, Nona Naderi, Yufang Hou 0001, Yonatan Bilu, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran, Tim Alberdingk Thijm, Graeme Hirst, Benno Stein 0001
EACL (1)2
2011 OrganismTagger: detection, normalization and grounding of organism entities in biomedical documents
abstract
MOTIVATION: Semantic tagging of organism mentions in full-text articles is an important part of literature mining and semantic enrichment solutions. Tagged organism mentions also play a pivotal role in disambiguating other entities in a text, such as proteins. A high-precision organism tagging system must be able to detect the numerous forms of organism mentions, including common names as well as the traditional taxonomic groups: genus, species and strains. In addition, such a system must resolve abbreviations and acronyms, assign the scientific name and if possible link the detected mention to the NCBI Taxonomy database for further semantic queries and literature navigation. RESULTS: We present the OrganismTagger, a hybrid rule-based/machine learning system to extract organism mentions from the literature. It includes tools for automatically generating lexical and ontological resources from a copy of the NCBI Taxonomy database, thereby facilitating system updates by end users. Its novel ontology-based resources can also be reused in other semantic mining and linked data tasks. Each detected organism mention is normalized to a canonical name through the resolution of acronyms and abbreviations and subsequently grounded with an NCBI Taxonomy database ID. In particular, our system combines a novel machine-learning approach with rule-based and lexical methods for detecting strain mentions in documents. On our manually annotated OT corpus, the OrganismTagger achieves a precision of 95%, a recall of 94% and a grounding accuracy of 97.5%. On the manually annotated corpus of Linnaeus-100, the results show a precision of 99%, recall of 97% and grounding accuracy of 97.4%. AVAILABILITY: The OrganismTagger, including supporting tools, resources, training data and manual annotations, as well as end user and developer documentation, is freely available under an open-source license at http://www.semanticsoftware.info/organism-tagger. CONTACT: [email protected].
Nona Naderi, Thomas Kappler, Christopher J. O. Baker, René Witte
Bioinform.1