Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Eugen Fazius
dblp:57/10258
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence motif analysis
motif scanning |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | SiTaR: a novel tool for transcription factor binding site prediction · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | SiTaR: a novel tool for transcription factor binding site prediction · Bioinform. 2011 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biological network › network biology › network inference
gene regulatory network inference |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | SiTaR: a novel tool for transcription factor binding site prediction · Bioinform. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
position weight matrix · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1double correlation · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | SiTaR: a novel tool for transcription factor binding site predictionabstractMOTIVATION: Prediction of transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) is crucial for promoter modeling and network inference. Quality of the predictions is spoiled by numerous false positives, which persist as the main problem for all presently available TFBS search methods. RESULTS: We suggest a novel approach, which is alternative to widely used position weight matrices (PWMs) and Hidden Markov Models. Each motif of the input set is used as a search template to scan a query sequence. Found motifs are assigned scores depending on the non-randomness of the motif's occurrence, the number of matching searching motifs and the number of mismatches. The non-randomness is estimated by comparison of observed numbers of matching motifs with those predicted to occur by chance. The latter can be calculated given the base compositions of the motif and the query sequence. The method does not require preliminary alignment of the input motifs, hence avoiding uncertainties introduced by the alignment procedure. In comparison with PWM-based tools, our method demonstrates higher precision by the same sensitivity and specificity. It also tends to outperform methods combining pattern and PWM search. Most important, it allows reducing the number of false positive predictions significantly. AVAILABILITY: The method is implemented in a tool called SiTaR (Site Tracking and Recognition) and is available at http://sbi.hki-jena.de/sitar/index.php. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Eugen Fazius, Vladimir Shelest, Ekaterina Shelest |
Bioinform. | 1 |