Ewout van den Berg

dblp:57/1063 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-authorTheory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Learning theory · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Information theory · 40% Mathematical optimization · 40% Algorithms and data structures · 20%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.412019
Estimating Information Flow in Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory
information-theoretic analysis
0.412019
Estimating Information Flow in Deep Neural Networks · ICML 2019
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing
0.112010
Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Mathematical optimization › sparse optimization
joint sparse recovery
0.112010
Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › norm optimization
l1 minimization
0.112010
Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing › sparse recovery
recovery guarantees
0.112010
Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2010

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutual information estimation · 0.4l1 minimization · 0.1ReMBo algorithm · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Estimating Information Flow in Deep Neural Networks
abstract
We study the estimation of the mutual information I(X;T_$\ell$) between the input X to a deep neural network (DNN) and the output vector T_$\ell$ of its $\ell$-th hidden layer (an “internal representation”). Focusing on feedforward networks with fixed weights and noisy internal representations, we develop a rigorous framework for accurate estimation of I(X;T_$\ell$). By relating I(X;T_$\ell$) to information transmission over additive white Gaussian noise channels, we reveal that compression, i.e. reduction in I(X;T_$\ell$) over the course of training, is driven by progressive geometric clustering of the representations of samples from the same class. Experimental results verify this connection. Finally, we shift focus to purely deterministic DNNs, where I(X;T_$\ell$) is provably vacuous, and show that nevertheless, these models also cluster inputs belonging to the same class. The binning-based approximation of I(X;T_$\ell$) employed in past works to measure compression is identified as a measure of clustering, thus clarifying that these experiments were in fact tracking the same clustering phenomenon. Leveraging the clustering perspective, we provide new evidence that compression and generalization may not be causally related and discuss potential future research ideas.
Ziv Goldfeld, Ewout van den Berg, Kristjan Greenewald, Igor Melnyk, Brian Kingsbury, Yury Polyanskiy
ICML2
2017 Training variance and performance evaluation of neural networks in speech
abstract
In this work we study variance in the results of neural network training on a wide variety of configurations in automatic speech recognition. Although this variance itself is well known, this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first paper that performs an extensive empirical study on its effects in speech recognition. We view training as sampling from a distribution and show that these distributions can have a substantial variance. These results show the urgent need to rethink the way in which results in the literature are reported and interpreted.
Ewout van den Berg, Bhuvana Ramabhadran, Michael Picheny
ICASSP1
2015 Semi-discrete Matrix-Free Formulation of 3D Elastic Full Waveform Inversion Modeling
Stephen Moore 0003, Devi Sudheer Chunduri, Sergiy Zhuk, Tigran T. Tchrakian, Ewout van den Berg, Albert Akhriev, Alberto Costa Nogueira Jr., Andrew A. Rawlinson, Lior Horesh
Euro-Par5
2015 Efficient GPU implementation of convolutional neural networks for speech recognition
Ewout van den Berg, Daniel Brand, Rajesh Bordawekar, Leonid Rachevsky, Bhuvana Ramabhadran
INTERSPEECH1
2014 Dictionary-based pitch tracking with dynamic programming
Ewout van den Berg, Bhuvana Ramabhadran
INTERSPEECH1
2013 Lower bounds for quantized matrix completion
abstract
In this paper we consider the problem of 1-bit matrix completion, where instead of observing a subset of the real-valued entries of a matrix M, we obtain a small number of binary (1-bit) measurements generated according to a probability distribution determined by the real-valued entries of M. The central question we ask is whether or not it is possible to obtain an accurate estimate of M from this data. In general this would seem impossible, however, it has recently been shown in [1] that under certain assumptions it is possible to recover M by optimizing a simple convex program. In this paper we provide lower bounds showing that these estimates are near-optimal.
Mary Wootters, Yaniv Plan, Mark A. Davenport, Ewout van den Berg
ISIT4
2010 Theoretical and empirical results for recovery from multiple measurements
abstract
The joint-sparse recovery problem aims to recover, from sets of compressed measurements, unknown sparse matrices with nonzero entries restricted to a subset of rows. This is an extension of the single-measurement-vector (SMV) problem widely studied in compressed sensing. We study the recovery properties of two algorithms for problems with noiseless data and exact-sparse representation. First, we show that recovery using sum-of-norm minimization cannot exceed the uniform-recovery rate of sequential SMV usingl1minimization, and that there are problems that can be solved with one approach, but not the other. Second, we study the performance of the ReMBo algorithm (M. Mishali and Y. Eldar, ¿Reduce and boost: Recovering arbitrary sets of jointly sparse vectors,¿IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 10, 4692-4702, Oct. 2008) in combination withl1minimization, and show how recovery improves as more measurements are taken. From this analysis, it follows that having more measurements than the number of linearly independent nonzero rows does not improve the potential theoretical recovery rate.
Ewout van den Berg, Michael P. Friedlander
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1
2009 Algorithm 890: Sparco: A Testing Framework for Sparse Reconstruction
abstract
Sparco is a framework for testing and benchmarking algorithms for sparse reconstruction. It includes a large collection of sparse reconstruction problems drawn from the imaging, compressed sensing, and geophysics literature. Sparco is also a framework for implementing new test problems and can be used as a tool for reproducible research. Sparco is implemented entirely in Matlab, and is released as open-source software under the GNU Public License.
Ewout van den Berg, Michael P. Friedlander, Gilles Hennenfent, Felix J. Herrmann, Rayan Saab, Özgür Yilmaz
ACM Trans. Math. Softw.1