Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert E. Wray

dblp:57/1766 · also Robert E. Wray III · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-5311-8593ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 30% Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 30% Language models and text generation · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computing education · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
normative reasoning
1.012026
Requirements for Aligned, Dynamic Resolution of Conflicts in Operational Constraints · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
Knowledge extraction from LLMs
0.812024
Improving Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Task Learning through Agent Analysis · AAAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent decision making
0.312026
Requirements for Aligned, Dynamic Resolution of Conflicts in Operational Constraints · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › agent architecture
cognitive agent
0.212024
Improving Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Task Learning through Agent Analysis · AAAI 2024
Computing education › learning environment
simulation-based training
0.012004
Synthetic Adversaries for Urban Combat Training · AAAI 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study analysis · 1.0prompt engineering · 0.8agent analysis · 0.8LLM · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Requirements for Aligned, Dynamic Resolution of Conflicts in Operational Constraints
abstract
Deployed, autonomous AI systems must often evaluate multiple plausible courses of action (extended sequences of behavior) in novel or under-specified contexts. Despite extensive training, these systems will inevitably encounter scenarios where no available course of action fully satisfies all operational constraints (e.g., operating procedures, rules, laws, norms, and goals). To achieve goals in accordance with human expectations and values, agents must go beyond their trained policies and instead construct, evaluate, and justify candidate courses of action. These processes require contextual ``knowledge'' that may lie outside prior (policy) training. This paper characterizes requirements for agent decision making in these contexts. It also identifies the types of knowledge agents require to make decisions robust to agent goals and aligned with human expectations. Drawing on both analysis and empirical case studies, we examine how agents need to integrate normative, pragmatic, and situational understanding to select and then to pursue more aligned courses of action in complex, real-world environments.
Steven J. Jones, Robert E. Wray, John E. Laird
AAAI2
2024 Improving Knowledge Extraction from LLMs for Task Learning through Agent Analysis
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer significant promise as a knowledge source for task learning. Prompt engineering has been shown to be effective for eliciting knowledge from an LLM, but alone it is insufficient for acquiring relevant, situationally grounded knowledge for an embodied agent learning novel tasks. We describe a cognitive-agent approach, STARS, that extends and complements prompt engineering, mitigating its limitations and thus enabling an agent to acquire new task knowledge matched to its native language capabilities, embodiment, environment, and user preferences. The STARS approach is to increase the response space of LLMs and deploy general strategies, embedded within the autonomous agent, to evaluate, repair, and select among candidate responses produced by the LLM. We describe the approach and experiments that show how an agent, by retrieving and evaluating a breadth of responses from the LLM, can achieve 77-94% task completion in one-shot learning without user oversight. The approach achieves 100% task completion when human oversight (such as an indication of preference) is provided. Further, the type of oversight largely shifts from explicit, natural language instruction to simple confirmation/discomfirmation of high-quality responses that have been vetted by the agent before presentation to a user.
James R. Kirk, Robert E. Wray, Peter Lindes, John E. Laird
AAAI2
2013 Adaptive Assessment in an Instructor-Mediated System
Jeremiah T. Folsom-Kovarik, Robert E. Wray, Laura Hamel
AIED2
2013 Scalable Models for Patterns of Life
abstract
Patterns of life (POL) are emergent properties of com- plex social systems such as neighborhoods or even cities. Accurately modeling POL is not only an academic pursuit; complex training and analysis efforts rely upon these models. Computational POL models will benefit academic researchers by giving them new tools to generate and validate theories about complex sociocultural patterns. POL presents an interesting computational modeling challenge for research in many AI fields because of its complex, multi-level interaction. POL modeling differs from standard agent-based modeling in that not only individual behaviors, but also their collective emergent patterns, are targets of study. At the same time, the behavior of any single individual is potentially important.
Jeremiah T. Folsom-Kovarik, Sae Lynne Schatz, Randolph M. Jones, Kathleen Bartlett, Robert E. Wray
IAAI5
2004 Synthetic Adversaries for Urban Combat Training
Robert E. Wray, John E. Laird, Andrew Nuxoll, Devvan Stokes, Alex Kerfoot
AAAI1
2003 An Architectural Approach to Ensuring Consistency in Hierarchical Execution
abstract
Hierarchical task decomposition is a method used in many agent systems to organize agent knowledge. This work shows how the combination of a hierarchy and persistent assertions of knowledge can lead to difficulty in maintaining logical consistency in asserted knowledge. We explore the problematic consequences of persistent assumptions in the reasoning process and introduce novel potential solutions. Having implemented one of the possible solutions, Dynamic Hierarchical Justification, its effectiveness is demonstrated with an empirical analysis.
Robert E. Wray, John E. Laird
J. Artif. Intell. Res.1
2001 Ontological engineering for B2B E-commerce
abstract
In this paper we discuss the nature of our overall enterprise to create ontologies in the product and service knowledge space for Business-to-Business (B2B) electronic commerce. We describe one crucial problem: the mapping problem, i.e., mapping among ontologies, taxonomies, and classification systems, some of which are more semantically sound and coherent than others. This problem we consider to be in need of a sustained research program if tenable solutions are to be found, since the lack of a solution will preclude widespread adoption of ontologies by the commercial world. Finally, we summarize the general issues we faced and indicate prospective future research.
Leo Obrst, Robert E. Wray, Howard Liu
FOIS2
1995 Organizing Information in Mosaic: A Classroom Experiment
Robert E. Wray, Ronald Chong, Joseph Perry Phillips, Seth Rogers, William Walsh, John E. Laird
Comput. Networks ISDN Syst.1