Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steve Bush

dblp:57/1905 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 95% Recommender systems · 5%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › personalized search
group-based personalization
0.112009
Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search · WSDM 2009
Information retrieval
personalized search
0.112009
Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search · WSDM 2009
Information retrieval
web search
0.112009
Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search · WSDM 2009
Information retrieval › interactive information retrieval › search interaction
collaborative search
0.112008
Enhancing collaborative web search with personalization: groupization, smart splitting, and group hit-highlighting · CSCW 2008
Information retrieval › web search
collaborative web search
0.112008
Enhancing collaborative web search with personalization: groupization, smart splitting, and group hit-highlighting · CSCW 2008
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.112008
Enhancing collaborative web search with personalization: groupization, smart splitting, and group hit-highlighting · CSCW 2008
Information retrieval
query log analysis
0.012009
Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search · WSDM 2009
Recommender systems › user modeling
user profile
0.012009
Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search · WSDM 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relevance judgment analysis · 0.1collaborative search experiment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Discovering and using groups to improve personalized search
abstract
Personalized Web search takes advantage of information about an individual to identify the most relevant results for that person. A challenge for personalization lies in collecting user profiles that are rich enough to do this successfully. One way an individual's profile can be augmented is by using data from other people. To better understand whether groups of people can be used to benefit personalized search, we explore the similarity of query selection, desktop information, and explicit relevance judgments across people grouped in different ways. The groupings we explore fall along two dimensions: the longevity of the group members' relationship, and how explicitly the group is formed. We find that some groupings provide valuable insight into what members consider relevant to queries related to the group focus, but that it can be difficult to identify valuable groups implicitly. Building on these findings, we explore an algorithm to "groupize" (versus "personalize") Web search results that leads to a significant improvement in result ranking on group-relevant queries.
Jaime Teevan, Meredith Ringel Morris, Steve Bush
WSDM3
2008 Enhancing collaborative web search with personalization: groupization, smart splitting, and group hit-highlighting
abstract
Collaboration on Web search is common in many domains, such as education and knowledge work; recently, HCI researchers have begun to introduce prototype collaborative search tools to support such scenarios. We analyze data from a collaborative search experiment, and based on these data we propose three techniques that can enhance the value of collaborative search tools using personalization: groupization, smart splitting, and group hit-highlighting.
Meredith Ringel Morris, Jaime Teevan, Steve Bush
CSCW3