Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matan Kalman
dblp:57/2086
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0001-8002-1148ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 56% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Generative modeling · 13% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Attention Improves Transformer · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
efficient attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Attention Improves Transformer · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
selective attention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Attention Improves Transformer · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | UniTune: Text-Driven Image Editing by Fine Tuning a Diffusion Model on a Single Image · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference acceleration
speculative decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
text-guided image editing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | UniTune: Text-Driven Image Editing by Fine Tuning a Diffusion Model on a Single Image · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
language modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Selective Attention Improves Transformer · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative Decoding · ICML 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
model quality assessment |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
protein structure validation |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation · Bioinform. 2010 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure analysis
membrane protein analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein structure prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein structure prediction
residue contact prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Co-evolving residues in membrane proteins · Bioinform. 2007 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular evolution
evolutionary conservation analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservation · Bioinform. 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic sampler initialization · 1.3diffusion model fine-tuning · 1.3speculative execution · 0.7sampling · 0.7statistical scoring · 0.1conservation pattern analysis · 0.1correlated mutation analysis · 0.1consensus prediction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Selective Attention Improves TransformerabstractUnneeded elements in the attention’s context degrade performance. We introduce Selective Attention, a simple parameter-free change to the standard attention mechanism which reduces attention to unneeded elements. Selective attention consistently improves language modeling and downstream task performance in a variety of model sizes and context lengths. For example, transformers trained with the language modeling objective on C4 with selective attention perform language modeling equivalently to standard transformers with ~2X more heads and parameters in their attention modules. Selective attention also allows decreasing the size of the attention’s context buffer, leading to meaningful reductions in the memory and compute requirements during inference. For example, transformers trained on C4 with context sizes of 512, 1,024, and 2,048 need 16X, 25X, and 47X less memory for their attention module, respectively, when equipped with selective attention, as those without selective attention, with the same validation perplexity. Yaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi Matias |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Fast Inference from Transformers via Speculative DecodingabstractInference from large autoregressive models like Transformers is slow - decoding K tokens takes K serial runs of the model. In this work we introduce speculative decoding - an algorithm to sample from autoregressive models faster without any changes to the outputs, by computing several tokens in parallel. At the heart of our approach lie the observations that (1) hard language-modeling tasks often include easier subtasks that can be approximated well by more efficient models, and (2) using speculative execution and a novel sampling method, we can make exact decoding from the large models faster, by running them in parallel on the outputs of the approximation models, potentially generating several tokens concurrently, and without changing the distribution. Our method can accelerate existing off-the-shelf models without retraining or architecture changes. We demonstrate it on T5-XXL and show a 2X-3X acceleration compared to the standard T5X implementation, with identical outputs. Yaniv Leviathan, Matan Kalman, Yossi Matias |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | UniTune: Text-Driven Image Editing by Fine Tuning a Diffusion Model on a Single ImageabstractText-driven image generation methods have shown impressive results recently, allowing casual users to generate high quality images by providing textual descriptions. However, similar capabilities for editing existing images are still out of reach. Text-driven image editing methods usually need edit masks, struggle with edits that require significant visual changes and cannot easily keep specific details of the edited portion. In this paper we make the observation that image-generation models can be converted to image-editing models simply by fine-tuning them on a single image. We also show that initializing the stochastic sampler with a noised version of the base image before the sampling and interpolating relevant details from the base image after sampling further increase the quality of the edit operation. Combining these observations, we propose UniTune, a novel image editing method. UniTune gets as input an arbitrary image and a textual edit description, and carries out the edit while maintaining high fidelity to the input image. UniTune does not require additional inputs, like masks or sketches, and can perform multiple edits on the same image without retraining. We test our method using the Imagen model in a range of different use cases. We demonstrate that it is broadly applicable and can perform a surprisingly wide range of expressive editing operations, including those requiring significant visual changes that were previously impossible. Dani Valevski, Matan Kalman, Eyal Molad, Eyal Segalis, Yossi Matias, Yaniv Leviathan |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 2 |
| 2010 | Quality assessment of protein model-structures using evolutionary conservationabstractMOTIVATION: Programs that evaluate the quality of a protein structural model are important both for validating the structure determination procedure and for guiding the model-building process. Such programs are based on properties of native structures that are generally not expected for faulty models. One such property, which is rarely used for automatic structure quality assessment, is the tendency for conserved residues to be located at the structural core and for variable residues to be located at the surface. RESULTS: We present ConQuass, a novel quality assessment program based on the consistency between the model structure and the protein's conservation pattern. We show that it can identify problematic structural models, and that the scores it assigns to the server models in CASP8 correlate with the similarity of the models to the native structure. We also show that when the conservation information is reliable, the method's performance is comparable and complementary to that of the other single-structure quality assessment methods that participated in CASP8 and that do not use additional structural information from homologs. AVAILABILITY: A perl implementation of the method, as well as the various perl and R scripts used for the analysis are available at http://bental.tau.ac.il/ConQuass/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Matan Kalman, Nir Ben-Tal |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2007 | Co-evolving residues in membrane proteinsabstractMOTIVATION: The analysis of co-evolving residues has been exhaustively evaluated for the prediction of intramolecular amino acid contacts in soluble proteins. Although a variety of different methods for the detection of these co-evolving residues have been developed, the fraction of correctly predicted contacts remained insufficient for their reliable application in the construction of structural models. Membrane proteins, which constitute between one-fourth and one-third of all proteins in an organism, were only considered in few individual case studies. RESULTS: We present the first general study of correlated mutations in alpha-helical membrane proteins. Using seven different prediction algorithms, we extracted co-evolving residues for 14 membrane proteins having a solved 3D structure. On average, distances between correlated pairs of residues lying on different transmembrane segments were found to be significantly smaller compared to a random prediction. Covariation of residues was frequently found in direct sequence neighborhood to helix-helix contacts. Based on the results obtained from individual prediction methods, we constructed a consensus prediction for every protein in the dataset that combines obtained correlations from different prediction algorithms and simultaneously removes likely false positives. Using this consensus prediction, 53% of all predicted residue pairs were found within one helix turn of an observed helix-helix contact. Based on the combination of co-evolving residues detected with the four best prediction algorithms, interacting helices could be predicted with a specificity of 83% and sensitivity of 42%. AVAILABILITY: http://webclu.bio.wzw.tum.de/helixcorr/ Angelika Fuchs, Antonio J. Martin-Galiano, Matan Kalman, Sarel Jacob Fleishman, Nir Ben-Tal, Dmitrij Frishman |
Bioinform. | 3 |