Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James W. Coyne

dblp:57/216 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Systems and software security · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Systems and software security
security engineering
0.011994
"Mainstreaming" Automated Information Systems Security Engineering (a case study in security run amok) · CCS 1994
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 "Mainstreaming" Automated Information Systems Security Engineering (a case study in security run amok)
abstract
Since mid-1992, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Mission Control Center (MCC) in Houston has pursued commonality and consolidation of facilities and equipment to reduce the implementation costs associated with the modernization of the control center, as well as the on-going operations and sustaining costs. In December of 1993, a management team, comprised almost entirely of individuals with manned spaceflight operations experience, was given the charter of completing the development. Past practices and conventional thinking have been set aside in an effort to deliver the new control center “better, faster, and cheaper”. This new paradigm has carried-over to the engineering associated with securing the control center's information resources. The group originally tasked with ensuring the security of the MCC's information resources was not directly associated with development or operations of the MCC, and thus had lost sight of the fact that the MCC's mission is the command and control of space vehicles, not the pursuit of information security. Under the new paradigm for control center development, responsibility for ensuring system security and integrity has been brought into the development organization. Old methods and approaches to security have been replaced by a new approach which emphasizes the implementation of an automated information systems security architecture that is both logical and cost effective.
James W. Coyne, Norman C. Kluksdahl
CCS1