Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arne Koopman
dblp:57/2459
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › structured data mining
relational data mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Characteristic relational patterns · KDD 2009 |
Data mining › pattern mining › structured pattern mining
relational pattern mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Characteristic relational patterns · KDD 2009 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Traffic Events Modeling for Structural Health Monitoring
Ugo Vespier, Arno J. Knobbe, Joaquin Vanschoren, Shengfa Miao, Arne Koopman, Bas Obladen, Carlos Bosma |
IDA | 5 |
| 2010 | InfraWatch: Data Management of Large Systems for Monitoring Infrastructural Performance
Arno J. Knobbe, Hendrik Blockeel, Arne Koopman, Toon Calders, Bas Obladen, Carlos Bosma, Hessel Galenkamp, Eddy Koenders, Joost N. Kok |
IDA | 3 |
| 2009 | Characteristic relational patternsabstractResearch in relational data mining has two major directions: finding global models of a relational database and the discovery of local relational patterns within a database. While relational patterns show how attribute values co-occur in detail, their huge numbers hamper their usage in data analysis. Global models, on the other hand, only provide a summary of how different tables and their attributes relate to each other, lacking detail of what is going on at the local level. Arne Koopman, Arno Siebes |
KDD | 1 |
| 2008 | Discovering Relational Items Sets EfficientlyabstractFrequent item set mining is a major data mining research area. Generalising from the standard single table case to a multi-relational setting is simple in principle, but hard in practice. That is, it is simple to define frequent item sets in the multi-relational setting, as well as extending the A-Priori algorithm. It is hard, because the well-known frequent pattern explosion at low min-sup settings is far worse than it is in the standard case. In this paper we introduce an effective algorithm for the discovery of frequent, multi-relational item sets. These relational patterns show which item sets occur together. Answering questions like: ‘What type of Books are bought together with what Record types?’. Hence, they provide a symmetric insight in the relation and reveal patterns that are relevant with respect to the relation. It extends our earlier work on using MDL to discover a small set of characteristic item sets. The algorithm, R-KRIMP, first discovers the small set of characteristic patterns in the single tables and then combines these to find a small set of characteristic multi-relational item sets. This reduces the original search space dramatically and, hence, brings down the computational complexity by orders of magnitude. In the experiments we show that this approach yields a very good approximation of the naive approach, joining all tables into one huge table, while being far more efficient. Arne Koopman, Arno Siebes |
SDM | 1 |
| 2004 | Evolving Genetic Regulatory Networks for Hardware Fault Tolerance
Arne Koopman, Daniel Roggen |
PPSN | 1 |