Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Arne Koopman

dblp:57/2459 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › structured data mining
relational data mining
0.112009
Characteristic relational patterns · KDD 2009
Data mining › pattern mining › structured pattern mining
relational pattern mining
0.112009
Characteristic relational patterns · KDD 2009
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Traffic Events Modeling for Structural Health Monitoring
Ugo Vespier, Arno J. Knobbe, Joaquin Vanschoren, Shengfa Miao, Arne Koopman, Bas Obladen, Carlos Bosma
IDA5
2010 InfraWatch: Data Management of Large Systems for Monitoring Infrastructural Performance
Arno J. Knobbe, Hendrik Blockeel, Arne Koopman, Toon Calders, Bas Obladen, Carlos Bosma, Hessel Galenkamp, Eddy Koenders, Joost N. Kok
IDA3
2009 Characteristic relational patterns
abstract
Research in relational data mining has two major directions: finding global models of a relational database and the discovery of local relational patterns within a database. While relational patterns show how attribute values co-occur in detail, their huge numbers hamper their usage in data analysis. Global models, on the other hand, only provide a summary of how different tables and their attributes relate to each other, lacking detail of what is going on at the local level.
Arne Koopman, Arno Siebes
KDD1
2008 Discovering Relational Items Sets Efficiently
abstract
Frequent item set mining is a major data mining research area. Generalising from the standard single table case to a multi-relational setting is simple in principle, but hard in practice. That is, it is simple to define frequent item sets in the multi-relational setting, as well as extending the A-Priori algorithm. It is hard, because the well-known frequent pattern explosion at low min-sup settings is far worse than it is in the standard case. In this paper we introduce an effective algorithm for the discovery of frequent, multi-relational item sets. These relational patterns show which item sets occur together. Answering questions like: ‘What type of Books are bought together with what Record types?’. Hence, they provide a symmetric insight in the relation and reveal patterns that are relevant with respect to the relation. It extends our earlier work on using MDL to discover a small set of characteristic item sets. The algorithm, R-KRIMP, first discovers the small set of characteristic patterns in the single tables and then combines these to find a small set of characteristic multi-relational item sets. This reduces the original search space dramatically and, hence, brings down the computational complexity by orders of magnitude. In the experiments we show that this approach yields a very good approximation of the naive approach, joining all tables into one huge table, while being far more efficient.
Arne Koopman, Arno Siebes
SDM1
2004 Evolving Genetic Regulatory Networks for Hardware Fault Tolerance
Arne Koopman, Daniel Roggen
PPSN1