Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert K. Abbott

dblp:57/3069 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Embedded and real-time systems · 46% Distributed systems · 25% Storage systems · 13%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 90% Indexing and storage engines · 6% Database system architecture and tuning · 5%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time databases
real-time transaction scheduling
0.021992
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992
Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance Evaluation · RTSS 1990
Transaction processing and concurrency control › transaction scheduling
real-time transaction scheduling
0.021989
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions with Disk Resident Data · VLDB 1989
Scheduling Real-time Transactions: a Performance Evaluation · VLDB 1988
Transaction processing and concurrency control
concurrency control
0.011992
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
real-time concurrency control
0.011992
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time databases
real-time transaction
0.011992
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992
Storage systems
i/o scheduling
0.011990
Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance Evaluation · RTSS 1990
Distributed systems › replication
data replication
0.011987
Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987
Distributed systems
distributed database
0.011987
Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011987
Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › network fault tolerance
network partition tolerance
0.011987
Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987
Cloud and datacenter computing
overload control
0.011992
Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy
modular redundancy
0.011987
Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation · 0.0serializable scheduling · 0.0locking · 0.0replication · 0.0redundancy · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1992 Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation
abstract
Managing transactionswith real-time requirements presents many new problems.In this paper we address several: How can we schedule transactions with deadlines?How do the real-time constraints affect concurrency control?How should overloads be handled?How does the scheduling of 1/0 requests affect the timeliness of transactions?How should exclusive and shared locking be handled?We describe a new group of algorithms for scheduling real-time transactions that produce serializable schedules.We present a model for scheduling transactions with deadlines on a single processor disk resident database system, and evaluate the scheduling algorithms through detailed simulation experiments.
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina
ACM Trans. Database Syst.1
1990 Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance Evaluation
abstract
The I/O scheduling problem is examined in detail. The authors present a realistic model for studying this problem in the context of a system which executes real-time transactions. The model takes advantage of the fact that reading from the disk occurs before a transaction commits, while writing to the disk usually occurs after the transaction commits. New algorithms are presented that exploit this fact in order to meet the deadlines of individual requests. The algorithms are evaluated via detailed simulation and their performance is compared with traditional disk scheduling algorithms.>
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina
RTSS1
1989 Scheduling Real-Time Transactions with Disk Resident Data
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina
VLDB1
1988 Scheduling Real-time Transactions: a Performance Evaluation
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina
VLDB1
1987 Reliable distributed database management
abstract
A reliable distributed database must manage dispersed and replicated data, making them available to users in spite of hardware failures. In this paper we study the algorithms and techniques that can achieve this reliability. Three scenarios are considered for reliable (i.e., nonpartitionable) networks. In the first, data are distributed but not replicated; in the second, data are replicated; and in the third, both data and processing are fully replicated in an n-modular redundancy strategy. A brief survey of methods for handling network partitions is included.
Hector Garcia-Molina, Robert K. Abbott
Proc. IEEE2