Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert K. Abbott
dblp:57/3069
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 1992
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 46% Distributed systems · 25% Storage systems · 13% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Transaction processing and concurrency control · 90% Indexing and storage engines · 6% Database system architecture and tuning · 5% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time databases
real-time transaction scheduling |
0.0 | 2 | 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992 Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance Evaluation · RTSS 1990 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › transaction scheduling
real-time transaction scheduling |
0.0 | 2 | 1989 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions with Disk Resident Data · VLDB 1989 Scheduling Real-time Transactions: a Performance Evaluation · VLDB 1988 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control
concurrency control |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992 |
Transaction processing and concurrency control › concurrency control
real-time concurrency control |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time databases
real-time transaction |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992 |
Storage systems
i/o scheduling |
0.0 | 1 | 1990 | Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance Evaluation · RTSS 1990 |
Distributed systems › replication
data replication |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987 |
Distributed systems
distributed database |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › network fault tolerance
network partition tolerance |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
overload control |
0.0 | 1 | 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance Evaluation · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 1992 |
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance › redundancy
modular redundancy |
0.0 | 1 | 1987 | Reliable distributed database management · Proc. IEEE 1987 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.0serializable scheduling · 0.0locking · 0.0replication · 0.0redundancy · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions: A Performance EvaluationabstractManaging transactionswith real-time requirements presents many new problems.In this paper we address several: How can we schedule transactions with deadlines?How do the real-time constraints affect concurrency control?How should overloads be handled?How does the scheduling of 1/0 requests affect the timeliness of transactions?How should exclusive and shared locking be handled?We describe a new group of algorithms for scheduling real-time transactions that produce serializable schedules.We present a model for scheduling transactions with deadlines on a single processor disk resident database system, and evaluate the scheduling algorithms through detailed simulation experiments. Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina |
ACM Trans. Database Syst. | 1 |
| 1990 | Scheduling I/O Requests with Deadlines: A Performance EvaluationabstractThe I/O scheduling problem is examined in detail. The authors present a realistic model for studying this problem in the context of a system which executes real-time transactions. The model takes advantage of the fact that reading from the disk occurs before a transaction commits, while writing to the disk usually occurs after the transaction commits. New algorithms are presented that exploit this fact in order to meet the deadlines of individual requests. The algorithms are evaluated via detailed simulation and their performance is compared with traditional disk scheduling algorithms.> Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina |
RTSS | 1 |
| 1989 | Scheduling Real-Time Transactions with Disk Resident Data
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina |
VLDB | 1 |
| 1988 | Scheduling Real-time Transactions: a Performance Evaluation
Robert K. Abbott, Hector Garcia-Molina |
VLDB | 1 |
| 1987 | Reliable distributed database managementabstractA reliable distributed database must manage dispersed and replicated data, making them available to users in spite of hardware failures. In this paper we study the algorithms and techniques that can achieve this reliability. Three scenarios are considered for reliable (i.e., nonpartitionable) networks. In the first, data are distributed but not replicated; in the second, data are replicated; and in the third, both data and processing are fully replicated in an n-modular redundancy strategy. A brief survey of methods for handling network partitions is included. Hector Garcia-Molina, Robert K. Abbott |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |