Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

K. D. Farrell

dblp:57/3252 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 87% Motion planning and robot control · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots › legged robot locomotion
bipedal locomotion
0.112007
Energetic Effects of Adding Springs at the Passive Ankles of a Walking Biped Robot · ICRA 2007
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
energy optimization
0.112007
Energetic Effects of Adding Springs at the Passive Ankles of a Walking Biped Robot · ICRA 2007

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory optimization · 0.1stability analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2007 Energetic Effects of Adding Springs at the Passive Ankles of a Walking Biped Robot
abstract
This paper investigates the energetic effects of adding springs at the passive ankles of a planar five-link, four-actuator walking biped robot. The energetic cost of walking with springs was determined by using a walking motion designed for the biped without springs added. The walking motion was then optimized for the presence of springs of various arbitrarily chosen stiffnesses and offset angles. The stability properties of the motions that resulted were checked. The energetic costs of walking and standing were then computed. It was found that standing with springs was more efficient, while walking was more costly than the same action without springs. Finally, the spring characteristics (stiffness and offset angle) and the motion were optimized simultaneously. The costs for walking and standing were computed, revealing that walking with springs was more efficient and standing was more costly than doing either without springs. A methodical approach to choosing the size of the feet based on this analysis of the spring characteristics is also presented.
K. D. Farrell, Christine Chevallereau, Eric R. Westervelt
ICRA1