Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Zeidler

dblp:57/3402 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture › reusable architecture
product line architecture
0.012002
Integrating hundred's of product through one architecture: the industrial IT architecture · ICSE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design
software architecture
0.012002
Integrating hundred's of product through one architecture: the industrial IT architecture · ICSE 2002
Requirements engineering and software design
software product lines
0.012002
Integrating hundred's of product through one architecture: the industrial IT architecture · ICSE 2002

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

case study · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Reuse vs. Reusability of Software Supporting Business Processes
Hermann Kaindl, Roman Popp, Ralph Hoch, Christian Zeidler
ICSR4
2002 Integrating hundred's of product through one architecture: the industrial IT architecture
abstract
During the last few years, software product line engineering has gained significant interest as a way for creating software products faster and cheaper. But what architecture is needed to integrate huge amounts of products, from different product lines? This paper describes such an architecture and its support processes and tools. Through cases, it is illustrated how the architecture is used to integrate new --- and old --- products in such diverse integration projects as vessel motion control, airport baggage handling systems, pulp&paper and oil&gas, in a very large organization. However, in a large organization it is a challenge to make everyone follow an architecture. Steps taken to ensure global architectural consistency are presented. It is concluded that a single architecture can be used to unify development in a huge organization, where the distributed development practices otherwise may prohibit integration of various products.
Lars Bratthall, Robert van der Geest, Holger Hofmann, Edgar Jellum, Zbigniew Korendo, Robert Martinez, Michal Orkisz, Christian Zeidler, Johan S. Andersson
ICSE8
2002 ICSR7 Workshop on Component-Based Software Development Processes
Christian Zeidler
ICSR1
1999 OMF-an object request broker for the process control application domain
abstract
Long before middleware became a market topic and professional providers offered out of the box functionality, industry like Asea Brown Boveri (ABB), had to provide solutions, which were based on what we today call middleware. Consequently, many industrial firms developed their own solutions. We describe an ABB proprietary middleware product called Object Management Facility (OMF). We present all its architectural properties and functional features. Wherever meaningful, we compare OMF's abilities with those offered by DCOM and CORBA and for some aspects important to the domain of control systems, we show that even today, OMF can compete with commercially available middleware products.
Matthias Nubling, Christian Popp, Christian Zeidler
EDOC3