Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tilmann F. W. Bruckhaus

dblp:57/4601 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers
Requirements engineering and software design · 35% Empirical software engineering · 33% Software maintenance and evolution · 32%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
cost-sensitive learning
0.122006
Maximum profit mining and its application in software development · KDD 2006
Predicting Software Escalations with Maximum ROI · ICDM 2005
Data mining › predictive modeling
escalation prediction
0.122006
Maximum profit mining and its application in software development · KDD 2006
Predicting Software Escalations with Maximum ROI · ICDM 2005
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
defect report analysis
0.012005
Predicting Software Escalations with Maximum ROI · ICDM 2005
Requirements engineering and software design
software process
0.011993
A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process modeling
0.011993
A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993
Empirical software engineering
systematic literature review
0.011993
A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers · ICSE 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

cost-sensitive learning · 0.2cost-sensitive decision tree · 0.1imbalanced learning · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Maximum profit mining and its application in software development
abstract
While most software defects (i.e., bugs) are corrected and tested as part of the lengthy software development cycle, enterprise software vendors often have to release software products before all reported defects are corrected, due to deadlines and limited resources. A small number of these defects will be escalated by customers and they must be resolved immediately by the software vendors at a very high cost. In this paper, we develop an Escalation Prediction (EP) system that mines historic defect report data and predict the escalation risk of the defects for maximum net profit. More specifically, we first describe a simple and general framework to convert the maximum net profit problem to cost-sensitive learning. We then apply and compare several well-known cost-sensitive learning approaches for EP. Our experiments suggest that the cost-sensitive decision tree is the best method for producing the highest positive net profit and comprehensible results. The EP system has been deployed successfully in the product group of an enterprise software vendor.
Charles Ling 0001, Victor S. Sheng, Tilmann F. W. Bruckhaus, Nazim H. Madhavji
KDD3
2005 Predicting Software Escalations with Maximum ROI
abstract
Enterprise software vendors often have to release software products before all reported defects are corrected, and a small number of these reported defects will be escalated by customers whose businesses are seriously impacted. Escalated defects must be quickly resolved at a high cost by the software vendors. The total costs can be even greater, including loss of reputation, satisfaction, loyalty, and repeat revenue. In this paper, we develop an Escalation Prediction (EP) system to mine historic defect report data and predict the escalation risk of current defect reports for maximum ROI (Return On Investment). More specifically, we first describe a simple and general framework to convert the maximum ROI problem to cost-sensitive learning. We then apply and compare several best-known cost-sensitive learning approaches for EP. The EP system has produced promising results, and has been deployed in the product group of an enterprise software vendor. Conclusions drawn from this study also provide guidelines for mining imbalanced datasets and cost-sensitive learning.
Charles Ling 0001, Shengli Sheng, Tilmann F. W. Bruckhaus, Nazim H. Madhavji
ICDM3
1993 A Comprehensive Process Model for Studying Software Process Papers
Rudolf K. Keller, Richard Lajoie, Nazim H. Madhavji, Tilmann F. W. Bruckhaus, Kamel Toubache, Won-Kook Hong, Khaled El Emam
ICSE4