Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michèl Schummer

dblp:57/493 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
0000-0002-7937-7884ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
gene expression analysis
0.022000
Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification
0.012000
Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational oncology
cancer classification from gene expression
0.012000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › sample classification
tissue classification
0.012000
Tissue classification with gene expression profiles · RECOMB 2000
Bioinformatics and computational biology
feature selection
0.012000
Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data · Bioinform. 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

support vector machine · 0.0machine learning classification · 0.0classification · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Tissue classification with gene expression profiles
abstract
Constantly improving gene expression profiling technologies are expected to provide understanding and insight into cancer related cellular processes. Gene expression data is also expected to significantly and in the development of efficient cancer diagnosis and classification platforms. In this work we examine two sets of gene expression data measured across sets of tumor and normal clinical samples One set consists of 2,000 genes, measured in 62 epithelial colon samples [1]. The second consists of ≈ 100,000 clones, measured in 32 ovarian samples (unpublished, extension of data set described in [26]).
Amir Ben-Dor, Laurakay Bruhn, Nir Friedman, Iftach Nachman, Michèl Schummer, Zohar Yakhini
RECOMB5
2000 Support vector machine classification and validation of cancer tissue samples using microarray expression data
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA microarray experiments generating thousands of gene expression measurements, are being used to gather information from tissue and cell samples regarding gene expression differences that will be useful in diagnosing disease. We have developed a new method to analyse this kind of data using support vector machines (SVMs). This analysis consists of both classification of the tissue samples, and an exploration of the data for mis-labeled or questionable tissue results. RESULTS: We demonstrate the method in detail on samples consisting of ovarian cancer tissues, normal ovarian tissues, and other normal tissues. The dataset consists of expression experiment results for 97,802 cDNAs for each tissue. As a result of computational analysis, a tissue sample is discovered and confirmed to be wrongly labeled. Upon correction of this mistake and the removal of an outlier, perfect classification of tissues is achieved, but not with high confidence. We identify and analyse a subset of genes from the ovarian dataset whose expression is highly differentiated between the types of tissues. To show robustness of the SVM method, two previously published datasets from other types of tissues or cells are analysed. The results are comparable to those previously obtained. We show that other machine learning methods also perform comparably to the SVM on many of those datasets. AVAILABILITY: The SVM software is available at http://www.cs. columbia.edu/ approximately bgrundy/svm.
Terrence S. Furey, Nello Cristianini, Nigel Duffy, David W. Bednarski, Michèl Schummer, David Haussler
Bioinform.5