Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter R. Bannister
dblp:57/6403
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2007
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
4 papers |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › radio propagation
extremely low frequency propagation |
0.0 | 4 | 1974 | Nighttime Variations of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Signal Strengths in Connecticut · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 Far-Field Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Propagation Measurements, 1970-1972 · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 Results of the Wisconsin Test Facility Buried Versus Elevated North-South Antennas Test · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 |
Physical-layer communications
propagation |
0.0 | 4 | 1974 | Nighttime Variations of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Signal Strengths in Connecticut · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 Far-Field Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Propagation Measurements, 1970-1972 · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 Results of the Wisconsin Test Facility Buried Versus Elevated North-South Antennas Test · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 |
Physical-layer communications › antenna systems
antenna |
0.0 | 2 | 1974 | Results of the Wisconsin Test Facility Buried Versus Elevated North-South Antennas Test · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 Wisconsin Test Facility Transmitting Antenna Pattern and Steering Measurements · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1974 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
magnetic field strength measurement · 0.0magnetic field measurement · 0.0field strength measurement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007 | Novelty Detection in Large-Vehicle Turbocharger Operation
David A. Clifton, Peter R. Bannister, Lionel Tarassenko |
IEA/AIE | 2 |
| 2007 | Integrating temporal information with a non-rigid method of motion correction for functional magnetic resonance images
Peter R. Bannister, J. Michael Brady, Mark Jenkinson |
Image Vis. Comput. | 1 |
| 2006 | Application of an Intuitive Novelty Metric for Jet Engine Condition Monitoring
David A. Clifton, Peter R. Bannister, Lionel Tarassenko |
IEA/AIE | 2 |
| 2006 | Learning Shape for Jet Engine Novelty Detection
David A. Clifton, Peter R. Bannister, Lionel Tarassenko |
ISNN (2) | 2 |
| 1974 | Far-Field Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Propagation Measurements, 1970-1972abstractFor the past 3 years, we have participated in various extremely low frequency (ELF) propagation tests. During these tests, receiving sites were located in Connecticut, North Carolina, Maine, Utah, Nova Scotia, California, Greenland, the Virgin Islands, Alaska, Norway, Hawaii, Greece, and Saipan. Measurements have also been taken sporadically in Connecticut since June 1970. At each location, the horizontal magnetic field strengths were measured at a band of frequencies centered at 45 Hz and 75 Hz in order to determine the average attenuation rates and relative excitation factors for daytime and nighttime propagation conditions. The U.S. Navy ELF Wisconsin Test Facility was the transmission source. The principal results obtained from these measurements were 1) the daytime attenuation rate is usually higher than the nighttime attenuation rate at both 45 and 75 Hz; 2) the relative excitation factors are quite different for daytime and nighttime propagation conditions; 3) nighttime propagation is more variable than daytime propagation; 4) there is a seasonal variation in the ELF propagation parameters; and 5) auroral-zone effects appear to be present at both frequencies. Peter R. Bannister |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 1974 | Wisconsin Test Facility Transmitting Antenna Pattern and Steering MeasurementsabstractDuring August and September 1971, the New London Laboratory, Naval Underwater Systems Center, performed pattern and steering measurements on the Wisconsin Test Facility (WTF) antennas. The pattern measurements were made at 13 locations in Minnesota and Wisconsin (covering approximately 120° of arc), while the far-field steering tests were taken in Maine and North Carolina. To be certain that the receiving sites were acceptable, several components of the received magnetic field were measured at each site and plotted on a normalized cosine curve. The 45- and 75-Hz pattern measurements were made at a range of approximately 300 km, while the steering measurements were performed at 1.7 Mm. The principal results from the pattern and steering measurements were 1) the east-west (EW) antenna pattern is skewed clockwise; 2) the north-south (NS) antenna pattern is skewed counterclockwise; and 3) the effective conductivity under the EW antenna is greater than the effective conductivity under the NS antenna. Peter R. Bannister, Frederick J. Williams, Alan L. Dahlvig, William A. Kraimer |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 1974 | Results of the Wisconsin Test Facility Buried Versus Elevated North-South Antennas TestabstractIn March and April 1973, the 76-Hz magnetic field strength, produced by the Wisconsin Test Facility elevated and (newly installed) buried north-south antennas, was measured in Wisconsin and Texas. The principal result obtained is that there is no measurable difference in performance between the two antennas. Peter R. Bannister, Frederick J. Williams, J. Robert Katan, John R. Ball |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |
| 1974 | Nighttime Variations of Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) Signal Strengths in ConnecticutabstractA limited amount of extremely low frequency (ELF) horizontal magnetic field strength measurements have been taken in Connecticut during the past 3 years. The transmission source for these 1.6 Mm range measurements was the U. S. Navy ELF Wisconsin Test Facility. The principal result obtained from these measurements is that there are considerable variations in the ELF nighttime propagation parameters. Peter R. Bannister, Frederick J. Williams, J. Robert Katan, Raymond F. Ingram |
IEEE Trans. Commun. | 1 |