Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Cole

dblp:57/7238 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2560-2484ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequencing data processing
next-generation sequencing quality control
0.212016
AlmostSignificant: simplifying quality control of high-throughput sequencing data · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis › differential expression analysis
RNA-seq differential expression
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › biostatistics › statistical bioinformatics
statistical genomics
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.212015
Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment · Bioinform. 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quality metric aggregation · 0.2support vector machine · 0.2position-specific scoring matrix · 0.2negative binomial model · 0.2log-normal model · 0.2artificial neural network · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A pipeline for harmonising NHS Scotland laboratory data to enable national-level analyses
Shahzad Mumtaz, Sophie McCall, Katherine O'sullivan, Mark M. McGilchrist, Daniel R. Morales, Katie Wilde, Charlie Mayor, Pamela Linksted, Kathy Harrison, Christian Cole, Emily R. Jefferson
J. Biomed. Informatics12
2016 AlmostSignificant: simplifying quality control of high-throughput sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The current generation of DNA sequencing technologies produce a large amount of data quickly. All of these data need to pass some form of quality control (QC) processing and checking before they can be used for any analysis. The large number of samples that are run through Illumina sequencing machines makes the process of QC an onerous and time-consuming task that requires multiple pieces of information from several sources. RESULTS: AlmostSignificant is an open-source platform for aggregating multiple sources of quality metrics as well as run and sample meta-data associated with DNA sequencing runs from Illumina sequencing machines. AlmostSignificant is a graphical platform to streamline the QC of DNA sequencing data, to store these data for future reference together with extra meta-data associated with the sequencing runs not typically retained. This simplifies the challenge of monitoring the volume of data produced by Illumina sequencers. AlmostSignificant has been used to track the quality of over 80 sequencing runs covering over 2500 samples produced over the last three years. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code and documentation for AlmostSignificant is freely available at https://github.com/bartongroup/AlmostSignificant CONTACTS: [email protected] or [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Joseph Ward, Christian Cole, Melanie Febrer, Geoffrey J. Barton
Bioinform.2
2015 Statistical models for RNA-seq data derived from a two-condition 48-replicate experiment
abstract
MOTIVATION: High-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) is now the standard method to determine differential gene expression. Identifying differentially expressed genes crucially depends on estimates of read-count variability. These estimates are typically based on statistical models such as the negative binomial distribution, which is employed by the tools edgeR, DESeq and cuffdiff. Until now, the validity of these models has usually been tested on either low-replicate RNA-seq data or simulations. RESULTS: A 48-replicate RNA-seq experiment in yeast was performed and data tested against theoretical models. The observed gene read counts were consistent with both log-normal and negative binomial distributions, while the mean-variance relation followed the line of constant dispersion parameter of ∼0.01. The high-replicate data also allowed for strict quality control and screening of 'bad' replicates, which can drastically affect the gene read-count distribution. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: RNA-seq data have been submitted to ENA archive with project ID PRJEB5348. CONTACT: [email protected].
Marek Gierlinski, Christian Cole, Pietà Schofield, Nicholas J. Schurch, Alexander Sherstnev, Vijender Singh, Nicola Wrobel, Karim Gharbi, Gordon G. Simpson, Tom Owen-Hughes, Mark L. Blaxter, Geoffrey J. Barton
Bioinform.2
2015 14-3-3-Pred: improved methods to predict 14-3-3-binding phosphopeptides
abstract
MOTIVATION: The 14-3-3 family of phosphoprotein-binding proteins regulates many cellular processes by docking onto pairs of phosphorylated Ser and Thr residues in a constellation of intracellular targets. Therefore, there is a pressing need to develop new prediction methods that use an updated set of 14-3-3-binding motifs for the identification of new 14-3-3 targets and to prioritize the downstream analysis of >2000 potential interactors identified in high-throughput experiments. RESULTS: Here, a comprehensive set of 14-3-3-binding targets from the literature was used to develop 14-3-3-binding phosphosite predictors. Position-specific scoring matrix, support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural network (ANN) classification methods were trained to discriminate experimentally determined 14-3-3-binding motifs from non-binding phosphopeptides. ANN, position-specific scoring matrix and SVM methods showed best performance for a motif window spanning from -6 to +4 around the binding phosphosite, achieving Matthews correlation coefficient of up to 0.60. Blind prediction showed that all three methods outperform two popular 14-3-3-binding site predictors, Scansite and ELM. The new methods were used for prediction of 14-3-3-binding phosphosites in the human proteome. Experimental analysis of high-scoring predictions in the FAM122A and FAM122B proteins confirms the predictions and suggests the new 14-3-3-predictors will be generally useful. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A standalone prediction web server is available at http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk/1433pred. Human candidate 14-3-3-binding phosphosites were integrated in ANIA: ANnotation and Integrated Analysis of the 14-3-3 interactome database.
Fábio Madeira, Michele Tinti, Gavuthami Murugesan, Emily Berrett, Margaret Stafford, Rachel Toth, Christian Cole, Carol MacKintosh, Geoffrey J. Barton
Bioinform.7