Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel C. Koboldt

dblp:57/7251 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-7290-3482ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 6 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genome annotation
genomic variant annotation
0.312018
Functional annotation of genomic variants in studies of late-onset Alzheimer's disease · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › functional genomics
variant functional annotation
0.312018
Functional annotation of genomic variants in studies of late-onset Alzheimer's disease · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.322012
SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › somatic mutation analysis
somatic mutation detection
0.112012
SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data · Bioinform. 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › chromosomal aberration detection
copy number aberration detection
0.112010
CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › copy number analysis
recurrent copy number alteration
0.112010
CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data · Bioinform. 2010
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequencing data analysis
0.112009
VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples · Bioinform. 2009
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
variant calling
0.112009
VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples · Bioinform. 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tissue-specific transcript set integration · 0.3gene-based rare-variant analysis · 0.3gene regulatory information integration · 0.3statistical modeling · 0.1sensitivity and precision estimation · 0.1correlation matrix diagonal segmentation · 0.1short read alignment · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Functional annotation of genomic variants in studies of late-onset Alzheimer's disease
abstract
Motivation: Annotation of genomic variants is an increasingly important and complex part of the analysis of sequence-based genomic analyses. Computational predictions of variant function are routinely incorporated into gene-based analyses of rare-variants, though to date most studies use limited information for assessing variant function that is often agnostic of the disease being studied. Results: In this work, we outline an annotation process motivated by the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project, illustrate the impact of including tissue-specific transcript sets and sources of gene regulatory information and assess the potential impact of changing genomic builds on the annotation process. While these factors only impact a small proportion of total variant annotations (∼5%), they influence the potential analysis of a large fraction of genes (∼25%). Availability and implementation: Individual variant annotations are available via the NIAGADS GenomicsDB, at https://www.niagads.org/genomics/ tools-and-software/databases/genomics-database. Annotations are also available for bulk download at https://www.niagads.org/datasets. Annotation processing software is available at http://www.icompbio.net/resources/software-and-downloads/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Mariusz Butkiewicz, Elizabeth E. Blue, Yuk Yee Leung, Xueqiu Jian, Edoardo Marcora, Alan E. Renton, Amanda Kuzma, Li-San Wang, Daniel C. Koboldt, Jonathan L. Haines, William S. Bush
Bioinform.9
2015 Genome Modeling System: A Knowledge Management Platform for Genomics
abstract
In this work, we present the Genome Modeling System (GMS), an analysis information management system capable of executing automated genome analysis pipelines at a massive scale. The GMS framework provides detailed tracking of samples and data coupled with reliable and repeatable analysis pipelines. The GMS also serves as a platform for bioinformatics development, allowing a large team to collaborate on data analysis, or an individual researcher to leverage the work of others effectively within its data management system. Rather than separating ad-hoc analysis from rigorous, reproducible pipelines, the GMS promotes systematic integration between the two. As a demonstration of the GMS, we performed an integrated analysis of whole genome, exome and transcriptome sequencing data from a breast cancer cell line (HCC1395) and matched lymphoblastoid line (HCC1395BL). These data are available for users to test the software, complete tutorials and develop novel GMS pipeline configurations. The GMS is available at https://github.com/genome/gms.
Malachi Griffith, Obi L. Griffith, Scott M. Smith, Avinash Ramu, Matthew B. Callaway, Anthony M. Brummett, Michael J. Kiwala, Adam C. Coffman, Allison A. Regier, Benjamin J. Oberkfell, Gabriel E. Sanderson, Thomas P. Mooney, Nathaniel G. Nutter, Edward A. Belter, Feiyu Du, Robert L. Long, Travis E. Abbott, Ian T. Ferguson, David L. Morton, Mark M. Burnett, James V. Weible, Joshua B. Peck, Adam Dukes, Joshua F. McMichael, Justin T. Lolofie, Brian R. Derickson, Jasreet Hundal, Zachary L. Skidmore, Benjamin J. Ainscough, Nathan D. Dees, William S. Schierding, Cyriac Kandoth, Kyung H. Kim, Charles Lu 0002, Christopher C. Harris, Nicole Maher, Christopher A. Maher, Vincent J. Magrini, Benjamin S. Abbott, Ken Chen 0001, Eric Clark, Indraniel Das, Xian Fan, Amy E. Hawkins, Todd G. Hepler, Todd Wylie, Shawn M. Leonard, William E. Schroeder, Xiaoqi Shi, Lynn K. Carmichael, Matthew R. Weil, Richard W. Wohlstadter, Gary Stiehr, Michael D. McLellan, Craig S. Pohl, Christopher A. Miller 0002, Daniel C. Koboldt, Jason R. Walker, James M. Eldred, David E. Larson, David J. Dooling, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson
PLoS Comput. Biol.57
2012 SomaticSniper: identification of somatic point mutations in whole genome sequencing data
abstract
MOTIVATION: The sequencing of tumors and their matched normals is frequently used to study the genetic composition of cancer. Despite this fact, there remains a dearth of available software tools designed to compare sequences in pairs of samples and identify sites that are likely to be unique to one sample. RESULTS: In this article, we describe the mathematical basis of our SomaticSniper software for comparing tumor and normal pairs. We estimate its sensitivity and precision, and present several common sources of error resulting in miscalls. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Binaries are freely available for download at http://gmt.genome.wustl.edu/somatic-sniper/current/, implemented in C and supported on Linux and Mac OS X. CONTACT: [email protected]; [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
David E. Larson, Christopher C. Harris, Ken Chen 0001, Daniel C. Koboldt, Travis E. Abbott, David J. Dooling, Timothy J. Ley, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson
Bioinform.4
2010 Challenges of sequencing human genomes
abstract
Massively parallel sequencing technologies continue to alter the study of human genetics. As the cost of sequencing declines, next-generation sequencing (NGS) instruments and datasets will become increasingly accessible to the wider research community. Investigators are understandably eager to harness the power of these new technologies. Sequencing human genomes on these platforms, however, presents numerous production and bioinformatics challenges. Production issues like sample contamination, library chimaeras and variable run quality have become increasingly problematic in the transition from technology development lab to production floor. Analysis of NGS data, too, remains challenging, particularly given the short-read lengths (35-250 bp) and sheer volume of data. The development of streamlined, highly automated pipelines for data analysis is critical for transition from technology adoption to accelerated research and publication. This review aims to describe the state of current NGS technologies, as well as the strategies that enable NGS users to characterize the full spectrum of DNA sequence variation in humans.
Daniel C. Koboldt, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson
Briefings Bioinform.1
2010 CMDS: a population-based method for identifying recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in cancer from high-resolution data
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA copy number aberration (CNA) is a hallmark of genomic abnormality in tumor cells. Recurrent CNA (RCNA) occurs in multiple cancer samples across the same chromosomal region and has greater implication in tumorigenesis. Current commonly used methods for RCNA identification require CNA calling for individual samples before cross-sample analysis. This two-step strategy may result in a heavy computational burden, as well as a loss of the overall statistical power due to segmentation and discretization of individual sample's data. We propose a population-based approach for RCNA detection with no need of single-sample analysis, which is statistically powerful, computationally efficient and particularly suitable for high-resolution and large-population studies. RESULTS: Our approach, correlation matrix diagonal segmentation (CMDS), identifies RCNAs based on a between-chromosomal-site correlation analysis. Directly using the raw intensity ratio data from all samples and adopting a diagonal transformation strategy, CMDS substantially reduces computational burden and can obtain results very quickly from large datasets. Our simulation indicates that the statistical power of CMDS is higher than that of single-sample CNA calling based two-step approaches. We applied CMDS to two real datasets of lung cancer and brain cancer from Affymetrix and Illumina array platforms, respectively, and successfully identified known regions of CNA associated with EGFR, KRAS and other important oncogenes. CMDS provides a fast, powerful and easily implemented tool for the RCNA analysis of large-scale data from cancer genomes.
Qunyuan Zhang, David E. Larson, Daniel C. Koboldt, Michael D. McLellan, Ken Chen 0001, Xiaoqi Shi, Aldi T. Kraja, Elaine R. Mardis, Richard K. Wilson, Ingrid B. Borecki, Michael A. Province
Bioinform.4
2009 VarScan: variant detection in massively parallel sequencing of individual and pooled samples
abstract
Abstract Summary: Massively parallel sequencing technologies hold incredible promise for the study of DNA sequence variation, particularly the identification of variants affecting human disease. The unprecedented throughput and relatively short read lengths of Roche/454, Illumina/Solexa, and other platforms have spurred development of a new generation of sequence alignment algorithms. Yet detection of sequence variants based on short read alignments remains challenging, and most currently available tools are limited to a single platform or aligner type. We present VarScan, an open source tool for variant detection that is compatible with several short read aligners. We demonstrate VarScan's ability to detect SNPs and indels with high sensitivity and specificity, in both Roche/454 sequencing of individuals and deep Illumina/Solexa sequencing of pooled samples. Availability and Implementation: Source code and documentation freely available at http://genome.wustl.edu/tools/cancer-genomics implemented as a Perl package and supported on Linux/UNIX, MS Windows and Mac OSX. Contact: [email protected] Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Daniel C. Koboldt, Ken Chen 0001, Todd Wylie, David E. Larson, Michael D. McLellan, Elaine R. Mardis, George M. Weinstock, Richard K. Wilson
Bioinform.1