Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tongyu Li
dblp:58/2775
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-4095-3490ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 3 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Image and video processing · 92% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 8% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
3 papers |
Software testing · 99% Programming languages and type systems · 1% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Whitened Score Diffusion: A Structured Prior for Imaging Inverse Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Whitened Score Diffusion: A Structured Prior for Imaging Inverse Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Whitened Score Diffusion: A Structured Prior for Imaging Inverse Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Image and video processing › mathematical imaging
inverse imaging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Whitened Score Diffusion: A Structured Prior for Imaging Inverse Problems · NeurIPS 2025 |
Software testing › dynamic testing › manual testing
crowdsourced testing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prioritize Crowdsourced Test Reports via Deep Screenshot Understanding · ICSE 2021 |
Software testing
mobile application testing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Prioritize Crowdsourced Test Reports via Deep Screenshot Understanding · ICSE 2021 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis
image understanding |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Prioritize Crowdsourced Test Reports via Deep Screenshot Understanding · ICSE 2021 |
Software testing
regression testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Regression Test Selection for Java Software · OOPSLA 2001 |
Software testing › regression testing
regression test selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Regression Test Selection for Java Software · OOPSLA 2001 |
Programming languages and type systems › object-oriented programming
java |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Regression Test Selection for Java Software · OOPSLA 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic differential equation · 1.7flow matching · 1.7denoising score matching · 1.7widget feature extraction · 1.0similarity computation · 1.0deep screenshot understanding · 1.0text-image semantic fusion · 0.6semi-supervised clustering · 0.6deep image understanding · 0.6program analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Whitened Score Diffusion: A Structured Prior for Imaging Inverse ProblemsabstractConventional score-based diffusion models (DMs) may struggle with anisotropic Gaussian diffusion processes due to the required inversion of covariance matrices in the denoising score matching training objective \cite{vincent_connection_2011}. We propose Whitened Score (WS) diffusion models, a novel framework based on stochastic differential equations that learns the Whitened Score function instead of the standard score. This approach circumvents covariance inversion, extending score-based DMs by enabling stable training of DMs on arbitrary Gaussian forward noising processes. WS DMs establish equivalence with flow matching for arbitrary Gaussian noise, allow for tailored spectral inductive biases, and provide strong Bayesian priors for imaging inverse problems with structured noise. We experiment with a variety of computational imaging tasks using the CIFAR, CelebA ($64\times64$), and CelebA-HQ ($256\times256$) datasets and demonstrate that WS diffusion priors trained on anisotropic Gaussian noising processes consistently outperform conventional diffusion priors based on isotropic Gaussian noise. Jeffrey Alido, Tongyu Li, Yu Sun 0022, Lei Tian 0005 |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | SemCluster: a semi-supervised clustering tool for crowdsourced test reports with deep image understandingabstractDue to the openness of crowdsourced testing, mobile app crowdsourced testing has been subject to duplicate reports. The previous research methods extract the textual features of the crowdsourced test reports, combine with shallow image analysis, and perform unsupervised clustering on the crowdsourced test reports to clarify the duplication of crowdsourced test reports and solve the problem. However, these methods ignore the semantic connection between textual descriptions and screenshots, making the clustering results unsatisfactory and the deduplication effect less accurate. Mingzhe Du, Shengcheng Yu, Chunrong Fang, Tongyu Li, Heyuan Zhang, Zhenyu Chen 0001 |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 4 |
| 2021 | Prioritize Crowdsourced Test Reports via Deep Screenshot UnderstandingabstractCrowdsourced testing is increasingly dominant in mobile application (app) testing, but it is a great burden for app developers to inspect the incredible number of test reports. Many researches have been proposed to deal with test reports based only on texts or additionally simple image features. However, in mobile app testing, texts contained in test reports are condensed and the information is inadequate. Many screenshots are included as complements that contain much richer information beyond texts. This trend motivates us to prioritize crowdsourced test reports based on a deep screenshot understanding. In this paper, we present a novel crowdsourced test report prioritization approach, namely DeepPrior. We fifirstrst represent the crowdsourced test reports with a novelly introduced feature, namely DeepFeature, that includes all the widgets along with their texts, coordinates, types, and even intents based on the deep analysis of the app screenshots, and the textual descriptions in the crowdsourced test reports. DeepFeature includes theBugFeature, which directly describes the bugs, and theContextFeature, which depicts the thorough context of the bug. The similarity of the DeepFeature is used to represent the test reports' similarity and prioritize the crowdsourced test reports. We formally define the similarity as DeepSimilarity. We also conduct an empirical experiment to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed technique with a large dataset group. The results show that DeepPrior is promising, and it outperforms the state-of-the-art approach with less than half the overhead. Shengcheng Yu, Chunrong Fang, Zhenfei Cao, Tongyu Li, Zhenyu Chen 0001 |
ICSE | 5 |
| 2001 | Regression Test Selection for Java SoftwareabstractRegression testing is applied to modified software to provide confidence that the changed parts behave as intended and that the unchanged parts have not been adversely affected by the modifications. To reduce the cost of regression testing, test cases are selected from the test suite that was used to test the original version of the software---this process is called regression test selection. A safe regressiontest -selection algorithm selects every test case in the test suite that may reveal a fault in the modified software. Safe regression-test-selection techniques can help to reduce the time required to perform regression testing because they select only a portion of the test suite for use in the testing but guarantee that the faults revealed by this subset will be the same as those revealed by running the entire test suite. This paper presents the first safe regression-test-selection technique that, based on the use of a suitable representation, handles the features of the Java language. Unlike other safe regression test selection techniques, the presented technique also handles incomplete programs. The technique can thus be safely applied in the (very common) case of Java software that uses external libraries or components Mary Jean Harrold, James A. Jones, Tongyu Li, Donglin Liang, Alessandro Orso, Maikel Pennings, Saurabh Sinha 0003, Steven Alexander Spoon, Ashish Gujarathi |
OOPSLA | 3 |