Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Siew-Hong Teh
dblp:58/3244
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › physical design
optical proximity correction |
0.2 | 2 | 2010 | Performance-Based Optical Proximity Correction Methodology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010 Design-process integration for performance-based OPC framework · DAC 2008 |
Electronic design automation
design for manufacturability |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Performance-Based Optical Proximity Correction Methodology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010 |
Electronic design automation › physical design
mask optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Performance-Based Optical Proximity Correction Methodology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010 |
Electronic design automation
physical design |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Performance-Based Optical Proximity Correction Methodology · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2010 |
Electronic design automation › physical design › VLSI layout
mask layout |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Design-process integration for performance-based OPC framework · DAC 2008 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.1performance matching · 0.1optical proximity correction · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Performance-Based Optical Proximity Correction MethodologyabstractThe rapid reduction in critical dimension of integrated circuits has lead to substantial mask data expansion for mask design based on traditional model-based full-chip optical proximity correction (OPC). Conventional EPE-OPC is mainly based on edge placement error (EPE) without consideration of its effect on circuit performance; often resulting in an overcorrected OPC mask with little improvement in circuit performance at the expense of much higher cost. In this paper, a performance-based OPC (PB-OPC) methodology is proposed taking into account both performance and cost. A less complex mask is generated based on the performance matching criteria. The framework exploits thein situestimated postlithography performance deviation error to drive the customized mask design algorithm. In particular, device PB-OPC (DPB-OPC) was deployed to systematically synthesize both polysilicon and diffusion masks by using mean drive current deviation as the controlled performance index. The proposed approach is validated via detailed simulation using 65-nm foundry libraries and IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems 1985 (ISCAS'85) benchmark circuits. When compared to conventional performance-aware EPE-OPC approach, the proposed DPB-OPC achieved 34% average reduction in mask size and up to 13.5% reduction in mean drive current deviation within reasonable run time. Siew-Hong Teh, Chun-Huat Heng, Arthur Tay |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 1 |
| 2008 | Design-process integration for performance-based OPC frameworkabstractAlong the continued shrinking of critical dimension (CD), the optical proximity correction (OPC) scheme inevitably becomes more aggressive and results in greater mask complexity and cost. Conventional OPC are edge-placement-error (EPE) driven without considering the effect of correction on circuit performance at all. We propose a performance-based OPC (PB- OPC) framework that employs a much simpler mask correction algorithm based on the real-time estimated device performances. When compared to the conventional OPC approach, our PB-OPC achieved 33 to 93% reduction in mask MEBES size and closer circuit performance matching to the design intent. Siew-Hong Teh, Chun-Huat Heng, Arthur Tay |
DAC | 1 |