Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Kelly

dblp:58/3690 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0003-2939-2274ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › robot actuation
antagonistic actuation
0.412019
Sleeve Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Antagonistically Actuated Joints · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuation
pneumatic artificial muscle
0.412019
Sleeve Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Antagonistically Actuated Joints · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation › actuator design
soft actuation
0.412019
Sleeve Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Antagonistically Actuated Joints · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping
0.312018
Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › assembly
peg-in-hole insertion
0.312018
Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Accessibility and assistive technology › assistive technology
assistive exoskeleton
0.112019
Sleeve Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Antagonistically Actuated Joints · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation
0.112018
Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation
robotic hand
0.112018
Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

stiffness analysis · 0.8pneumatic actuation · 0.8energy analysis · 0.8task-level logic · 0.3performance benchmarking · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Sleeve Pneumatic Artificial Muscles for Antagonistically Actuated Joints
abstract
Pneumatic artificial muscles (PAMs) have been researched for applications in powered exoskeletons, orthosis and robotics. Their high force to mass ratio, low cost and inherent compliance are particularly advantageous for systems requiring physical interaction with humans.Sleeve PAMs, which introduce an internal structure to the actuator, offer improved force capacity, contraction ratio, efficiency and operating bandwidth. In this paper sleeve PAMs are applied to a popular muscle configuration; that of a joint operated antagonistically by two muscles. It is shown that the sleeve PAM can increases the range of joint rotation by 14% or load capacity by over 50% of that of a comparable joint actuated with traditional PAMs, depending on the joint configuration. The stiffness of joints actuated with both PAM types is also studied, particularly the case of closed system operation (mass of air in the PAMs is constant), where the reduced volume of the sleeve PAM significantly increases the observed stiffness. Finally energy consumption is considered, showing substantial savings in the case of joints actuated with sleeve PAMs.
Michael Cullinan, Conor McGinn, Kevin Kelly
ICRA3
2018 Comparative Peg-in-Hole Testing of a Force-Based Manipulation Controlled Robotic Hand
abstract
Force-based manipulation control strategies are evolving as a primary mechanism in robotics for performing the fine manipulation tasks typical within manufacturing assembly. The ability to systematically compare robotic system performance and quantify true advancement in fine manipulation is of utmost importance. Accordingly, the objectives of this paper are threefold: 1) creation of a peg-in-hole test method with associated performance metrics and a systematic data analysis strategy for performance benchmarking, 2) first demonstration of a recently developed manipulation controller piloting a robotic hand and its paired task-level logic for completing the peg-in-hole test, and 3) exemplifying the performance benchmarking technique by comparing two approaches for robotic insertions-the previously mentioned compliant hand, stiff arm system, and a stiff gripper, compliant arm system. Analyses reveal that the unconventional hand system can perform at and sometimes above the level of the gripper system in the developed peg-in-hole scenario. Moreover, the hand's active control of the peg's full Cartesian pose reduces positional error sensitivity and minimizes exerted insertion forces, highlighting the strategy's potential for fine manipulation tasks. Results indicate that robotic arms equipped with highly articulated and sensorized robotic hands can provide a truly realizable solution path for performing peg-in-hole tasks.
Karl Van Wyk, Mark Culleton, Joe Falco, Kevin Kelly
IEEE Trans. Robotics4