Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Martin Trachtenberg

dblp:58/4286 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Empirical software engineering · 69% Debugging and program repair · 31%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software metrics
0.011986
Validating Halstead's Theory with System 3 Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.011983
Order and Difficulty of Debugging · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
Empirical software engineering › software metrics
fault density
0.011986
Validating Halstead's Theory with System 3 Data · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1986
Empirical software engineering › software engineering research methodology
empirical study
0.011983
Order and Difficulty of Debugging · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1983
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Validating Halstead's Theory with System 3 Data
abstract
Gaffney (ibid., vol.SE-10, no.7, pp.459-463, 1984) concludes that the number of faults per line of code is independent of whether Assembly language or a high order language is used. This is contrary to the results published by the commenter (ibid. vol.SE-8, pp.437-439, July 1982). It is contended that the paper by Gaffney contains some technical errors and uses erroneous data. An explanation of the source of the erroneous data is given. Also, previously published information by the commenter on the average number of operators plus operands per line of Assembly language code is corrected.
Martin Trachtenberg
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1
1983 Order and Difficulty of Debugging
abstract
The earlier findings of Shooman and Bolsky, that the difficulty of detecting or correcting a software bug is independent of its order of detection, is challenged by new data which shows definite tendencies for early bugs to need less time to be detected and more to be corrected than later bugs.
Martin Trachtenberg
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.1