Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kathleen M. Mutch

dblp:58/4495 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Image and video processing · 100%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
3D vision · 51% Segmentation and scene understanding · 42% Video understanding and tracking · 8%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video processing
motion analysis
0.021986
Determining Object Translation Information Using Stereoscopic Motion · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1986
Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.021985
Dynamic Occlusion Analysis in Optical Flow Fields · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Edge Detection in Optical Flow Fields · AAAI 1982
Image and video processing
edge detection
0.021985
Dynamic Occlusion Analysis in Optical Flow Fields · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Edge Detection in Optical Flow Fields · AAAI 1982
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › boundary detection
occlusion boundary detection
0.011985
Dynamic Occlusion Analysis in Optical Flow Fields · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Image and video processing › occlusion handling
occlusion boundary detection
0.011985
Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.011985
Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
edge detection
0.011982
Edge Detection in Optical Flow Fields · AAAI 1982
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
stereo depth estimation
0.011986
Determining Object Translation Information Using Stereoscopic Motion · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1986
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
dynamic scene analysis
0.011985
Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

image matching · 0.0vector field analysis · 0.0marr-hildreth detector · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 Matching straight lines
James H. McIntosh, Kathleen M. Mutch
Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process.2
1986 Determining Object Translation Information Using Stereoscopic Motion
abstract
Stereoscopic motion is an approach for comparing image change due to motion in a stereo pair of image sequences. Qualitatively, the relative image change shows that an object point is approaching, receding, or remaining at constant depth. Quantitatively, the relative change predicts where the object point will pass with respect to the camera system.
Kathleen M. Mutch
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1985 Analysis of Accretion and Deletion at Boundaries in Dynamic Scenes
abstract
In dynamic scenes, the presence of object boundaries is often signaled by the appearance or disappearance of occluded surfaces over time. Such regions of surface accretion or deletion can be found using matching techniques similar to those used to determine optical flow in an image sequence. Regions in one frame that are not adequately matched by any region in previous frames correspond to accretion. Regions that have no matches in subsequent frames correspond to deletion. In either case, an occlusion boundary is present. Furthermore, by associating accretion or deletion regions with a surface on one side of a boundary, it is possible to determine which side of the boundary is being occluded. This association can be based purely on visual motion-the accretion or deletion region moves with the same image velocity as the remaining visible surface to which it is attached.
Kathleen M. Mutch, William B. Thompson
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
1985 Dynamic Occlusion Analysis in Optical Flow Fields
abstract
Optical flow can be used to locate dynamic occlusion boundaries in an image sequence. We derive an edge detection algorithm sensitive to changes in flow fields likely to be associated with occlusion. The algorithm is patterned after the Marr-Hildreth zero-crossing detectors currently used to locate boundaries in scalar fields. Zero-crossing detectors are extended to identify changes in direction and/or magnitude in a vector-valued flow field. As a result, the detector works for flow boundaries generated due to the relative motion of two overlapping surfaces, as well as the simpler case of motion parallax due to a sensor moving through an otherwise stationary environment. We then show how the approach can be extended to identify which side of a dynamic occlusion boundary corresponds to the occluding surface. The fundamental principal involved is that at an occlusion boundary, the image of the surface boundary moves with the image of the occluding surface. Such information is important in interpreting dynamic scenes. Results are demonstrated on optical flow fields automatically computed from real image sequences.
William B. Thompson, Kathleen M. Mutch, Valdis Berzins
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.2
1982 Edge Detection in Optical Flow Fields
William B. Thompson, Kathleen M. Mutch, Valdis Berzins
AAAI2