Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kyle O'Brien
dblp:58/5014
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Language models and text generation · 44% Trustworthy machine learning · 32% Efficient and distributed learning · 19% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 77% Integrated circuit design · 23% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
inference-time intervention |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models › memorization
memorization in language models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Recite, Reconstruct, Recollect: Memorization in LMs as a Multifaceted Phenomenon · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
large language model training dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scaling · ICML 2023 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | High-Performance Deep-Learning Coprocessor Integrated into x86 SoC with Server-Class CPUs Industrial Product · ISCA 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
knowledge editing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language Models · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
training data replication |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Recite, Reconstruct, Recollect: Memorization in LMs as a Multifaceted Phenomenon · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model quantization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | High-Performance Deep-Learning Coprocessor Integrated into x86 SoC with Server-Class CPUs Industrial Product · ISCA 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model deployment
quantized model deployment |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | High-Performance Deep-Learning Coprocessor Integrated into x86 SoC with Server-Class CPUs Industrial Product · ISCA 2020 |
Integrated circuit design
system-on-chip |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | High-Performance Deep-Learning Coprocessor Integrated into x86 SoC with Server-Class CPUs Industrial Product · ISCA 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
taxonomy construction · 0.9predictive modeling · 0.9model compression · 0.9machine unlearning · 0.9knowledge editing · 0.9quantization · 0.9SIMD architecture · 0.9scaling analysis · 0.7checkpoint analysis · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Composable Interventions for Language ModelsabstractTest-time interventions for language models can enhance factual accuracy, mitigate harmful outputs, and improve model efficiency without costly retraining. But despite a flood of new methods, different types of interventions are largely developing independently.
In practice, multiple interventions must be applied sequentially to the same model, yet we lack standardized ways to study how interventions interact. We fill this gap by introducing composable interventions, a framework to study the effects of using multiple interventions on the same language models, featuring new metrics and a unified codebase. Using our framework, we conduct extensive experiments and compose popular methods from three emerging intervention categories---knowledge editing, model compression, and machine unlearning. Our results over 417 different compositions uncover meaningful interactions: compression hinders editing and unlearning, composing interventions hinges on their order of application, and popular general-purpose metrics are inadequate for assessing composability. Taken together, our findings showcase clear gaps in composability, suggesting a need for new multi-objective interventions. Arinbjörn Kolbeinsson, Kyle O'Brien, Tianjin Huang, Shanghua Gao, Shiwei Liu 0003, Jonathan Schwarz, Anurag Vaidya, Faisal Mahmood 0001, Marinka Zitnik, Tianlong Chen 0001, Thomas Hartvigsen |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Recite, Reconstruct, Recollect: Memorization in LMs as a Multifaceted PhenomenonabstractMemorization in language models is typically treated as a homogenous phenomenon, neglecting the specifics of the memorized data. We instead model memorization as the effect of a set of complex factors that describe each sample and relate it to the model and corpus. To build intuition around these factors, we break memorization down into a taxonomy: recitation of highly duplicated sequences, reconstruction of inherently predictable sequences, and recollection of sequences that are neither. We demonstrate the usefulness of our taxonomy by using it to construct a predictive model for memorization. By analyzing dependencies and inspecting the weights of the predictive model, we find that different factors have different influences on the likelihood of memorization depending on the taxonomic category. USVSN Sai Prashanth, Alvin Deng, Kyle O'Brien, Jyothir S. V, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Jaydeep Borkar, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Jacob Ray Fuehne, Stella Biderman, Tracy Ke, Katherine Lee, Naomi Saphra |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingabstractHow do large language models (LLMs) develop and evolve over the course of training? How do these patterns change as models scale? To answer these questions, we introduce Pythia, a suite of 16 LLMs all trained on public data seen in the exact same order and ranging in size from 70M to 12B parameters. We provide public access to 154 checkpoints for each one of the 16 models, alongside tools to download and reconstruct their exact training dataloaders for further study. We intend Pythia to facilitate research in many areas, and we present several case studies including novel results in memorization, term frequency effects on few-shot performance, and reducing gender bias. We demonstrate that this highly controlled setup can be used to yield novel insights toward LLMs and their training dynamics. Trained models, analysis code, training code, and training data can be found at https://github.com/EleutherAI/pythia. Stella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Anthony, Herbie Bradley, Kyle O'Brien, Eric Hallahan, Mohammad Aflah Khan, Shivanshu Purohit, USVSN Sai Prashanth, Edward Raff, Aviya Skowron, Lintang Sutawika, Oskar van der Wal |
ICML | 5 |
| 2020 | High-Performance Deep-Learning Coprocessor Integrated into x86 SoC with Server-Class CPUs Industrial ProductabstractDemand for high performance deep learning (DL) inference in software applications is growing rapidly. DL workloads run on myriad platforms, including general purpose processors (CPU), system-on-chip (SoC) with accelerators, graphics processing units (GPU), and neural processing unit (NPU) addin cards. DL software engineers typically must choose between relatively slow general hardware (e.g., CPUs, SoCs) or relatively expensive, large, power-hungry hardware (e.g., GPUs, NPUs). This paper describes Centaur Technology's Ncore, the industry's first high-performance DL coprocessor technology integrated into an x86 SoC with server-class CPUs. Ncore's 4096 byte-wide SIMD architecture supports INT8, UINT8, INT16, and BF16 datatypes, with 20 tera-operations-per-second compute capability. Ncore shares the SoC ring bus for low-latency communication and work sharing with eight 64-bit x86 cores, offering flexible support for new and evolving models. The x86 SoC platform can further scale out performance via multiple sockets, systems, or third-party PCIe accelerators. Ncore's software stack automatically converts quantized models for Ncore consumption and leverages existing DL frameworks. In MLPerf's Inference v0.5 closed division benchmarks, Ncore achieves 1218 IPS throughput and 1.05ms latency on ResNet-50v1.5 and achieves lowest latency of all Mobilenet-V1 submissions (329μs). Ncore yields 23x speedup over other x86 vendor percore throughput, while freeing its own x86 cores for other work. Ncore is the only integrated solution among the memory intensive neural machine translation (NMT) submissions. G. Glenn Henry, Parviz Palangpour, Michael Thomson, J. Scott Gardner, Bryce Arden, Jim Donahue, Kimble Houck, Jonathan Johnson, Kyle O'Brien, Scott Petersen, Benjamin Seroussi, Tyler Walker |
ISCA | 9 |
| 2008 | Power and performance characteristics of USB flash drivesabstractEven though their capacities are still orders of magnitude lower than those of hard disks, flash storage systems are rapidly gaining importance in energy-constrained systems. This paper focuses on USB flash drives, which can provide portable storage to mobile systems or storage to systems that otherwise do not have persistent storage opportunities (e.g., low-power sensor devices). The paper presents studies relating to power consumption, energy overheads and benefits, and performance impacts of USB flash drives. The key insights obtained from these experiments are that (i) read/write costs are not significantly greater than idle costs and (ii) the size of the flash itself has only limited bearing on energy consumption. Kyle O'Brien, David Salyers, Aaron Striegel, Christian Poellabauer |
WOWMOM | 1 |