Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sitaram Raju
dblp:58/6046
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › combinational logic synthesis
combinational logic optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991 |
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991 |
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
sequential circuit optimization |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
retiming · 0.0logic migration across latches · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logicabstractThe timing optimization of multiphase logic entails the reduction of the overall cycle time of the machine and/or input-to-output delays by distributing computation throughout the entire clock cycle. A tool has been developed to automatically perform this optimization task, and it has been implemented as a set of extensions to the combinational logic optimization tool, misII. The algorithms yield improvements that are on average 10-20% better than what is achievable using purely combinational logic optimization tools that do not move logic across latches. These improvements represent 75% of what would be possible in the most idealized case. Results on simple two-phase circuits show average input-to-output delay improvements of 13% with area penalties of 11%. For a four-phase controller used in the SPUR processor it yields an improvement in cycle time of 18% with an area penalty of 11%. Experiments indicate that the optimization algorithm is highly insensitive to parameter variations in the underlying combinational logic optimization routines and initial state assignment.> Karen A. Bartlett, Gaetano Borriello, Sitaram Raju |
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. | 3 |