Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sitaram Raju

dblp:58/6046 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis › combinational logic synthesis
combinational logic optimization
0.011991
Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Electronic design automation
logic synthesis
0.011991
Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991
Electronic design automation › logic synthesis
sequential circuit optimization
0.011991
Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 1991

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

retiming · 0.0logic migration across latches · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1991 Timing optimization of multiphase sequential logic
abstract
The timing optimization of multiphase logic entails the reduction of the overall cycle time of the machine and/or input-to-output delays by distributing computation throughout the entire clock cycle. A tool has been developed to automatically perform this optimization task, and it has been implemented as a set of extensions to the combinational logic optimization tool, misII. The algorithms yield improvements that are on average 10-20% better than what is achievable using purely combinational logic optimization tools that do not move logic across latches. These improvements represent 75% of what would be possible in the most idealized case. Results on simple two-phase circuits show average input-to-output delay improvements of 13% with area penalties of 11%. For a four-phase controller used in the SPUR processor it yields an improvement in cycle time of 18% with an area penalty of 11%. Experiments indicate that the optimization algorithm is highly insensitive to parameter variations in the underlying combinational logic optimization routines and initial state assignment.>
Karen A. Bartlett, Gaetano Borriello, Sitaram Raju
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.3