Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ben Hallen
dblp:58/6140
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2001
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design › software design notation
design structure matrix |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The structure and value of modularity in software design · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software design principles
information hiding |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The structure and value of modularity in software design · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design
modularity |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | The structure and value of modularity in software design · ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
real options analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | The structure and value of modularity in software designabstractThe concept of information hiding modularity is a cornerstone of modern software design thought, but its formulation remains casual and its emphasis on changeability is imperfectly related to the goal of creating added value in a given context. We need better explanatory and prescriptive models of the nature and value of information hiding. We evaluate the potential of a new theory---developed to account for the influence of modularity on the evolution of the computer industry---to inform software design. The theory uses design structure matrices to model designs and real options techniques to value them. To test the potential utility of the theory for software we apply it to Parnas's KWIC designs. We contribute an extension to design structure matrices, and we show that the options results are consistent with Parnas's conclusions. Our results suggest that such a theory does have potential to help inform software design. Kevin J. Sullivan, William G. Griswold, Yuanfang Cai, Ben Hallen |
ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE | 4 |