Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erik Sinsel

dblp:58/7020 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2000
0000-0001-7929-7887ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Empirical software engineering
software effort estimation
0.012000
Practical Large Scale What-If Queries: Case Studies with Software Risk Assessment · ASE 2000
Empirical software engineering › software project management
software risk analysis
0.012000
Practical Large Scale What-If Queries: Case Studies with Software Risk Assessment · ASE 2000

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

treatment learning · 0.0monte carlo simulation · 0.0decision tree ensemble · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2000 Practical Large Scale What-If Queries: Case Studies with Software Risk Assessment
abstract
When a lack of data inhibits decision-making, large-scale what-if queries can be conducted over the uncertain parameter ranges. Such queries can generate an overwhelming amount of data. We describe a general method for understanding that data. Large-scale what-if queries can guide Monte Carlo simulations of a model. Machine learning can then be used to summarize the output. The summarization is an ensemble of decision trees. The TARZAN system [so-called because it swings through (or searches) the decision trees] can poll the ensemble looking for majority conclusions regarding what factors change the classifications of the data. TARZAN can succinctly present the results from very large what-if queries. For example, in one of the studies presented, we can view the significant features from 10/sup 9/ what-if queries on half a page.
Tim Menzies, Erik Sinsel
ASE2