Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sanjay P. Bhat

dblp:58/7139 · also Sanjay Bhat · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-8595-6081ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Reinforcement learning · 47% Learning theory · 25% Multi-agent systems · 14%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers
Energy systems and smart grids · 85% Computational finance and economics · 15%
Theoretical computer science
4 papers
Information theory · 28% Algorithms and data structures · 27% Mathematical optimization · 27%

Topics — the 17 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Energy systems and smart grids
energy trading
0.822020
Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020
VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019
Energy systems and smart grids › electricity market
smart grid markets
0.822020
Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020
VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
sample complexity lower bounds
0.812024
Risk Estimation in a Markov Cost Process: Lower and Upper Bounds · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities
0.612022
A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Concentration of Empirical Risk Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical decision theory
risk measures
0.612022
A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Concentration of Empirical Risk Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Information theory › probability theory › measure concentration
concentration inequalities
0.522021
Concentration of risk measures: A Wasserstein distance approach · NeurIPS 2019
Estimation of Spectral Risk Measures · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.512021
Computing an Efficient Exploration Basis for Learning with Univariate Polynomial Features · AAAI 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
bidding strategy
0.412020
Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
autonomous agents
0.412019
VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › trading agents
broker agents
0.412019
VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019
Computational finance and economics
risk measures
0.412019
Concentration of risk measures: A Wasserstein distance approach · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
risk-aware bandit
0.322022
A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Concentration of Empirical Risk Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Concentration of risk measures: A Wasserstein distance approach · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
stochastic bandit
0.322022
A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Concentration of Empirical Risk Estimates · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022
Concentration of risk measures: A Wasserstein distance approach · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
markov decision process
0.222020
Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy · AAAI 2020
VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition · AAAI 2019
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
auction theory
0.212022
VidyutVanika21: An Autonomous Intelligent Broker for Smart-grids · IJCAI 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › auction theory
bidding strategy
0.212022
VidyutVanika21: An Autonomous Intelligent Broker for Smart-grids · IJCAI 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation
0.112021
Estimation of Spectral Risk Measures · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wasserstein distance · 1.7reinforcement learning · 1.6game-theoretic analysis · 1.1univariate polynomial features · 1.0numerical integration · 1.0concentration analysis · 1.0markov decision process · 0.9equilibrium analysis · 0.9truncation scheme · 0.8dynamic programming · 0.8concentration bounds · 0.8concentration inequalities · 0.6neural network · 0.4heuristic search · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Risk Estimation in a Markov Cost Process: Lower and Upper Bounds
abstract
We tackle the problem of estimating risk measures of the infinite-horizon discounted cost of a Markov cost process. The risk measures we study include variance, Value-at-Risk (VaR), and Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR). First, we show that estimating any of these risk measures with $\epsilon$-accuracy, either in expected or high-probability sense, requires at least $\Omega(1/\epsilon^2)$ samples. Then, using a truncation scheme, we derive an upper bound for the CVaR and variance estimation. This bound matches our lower bound up to logarithmic factors. Finally, we discuss an extension of our estimation scheme that covers more general risk measures satisfying a certain continuity criterion, such as spectral risk measures and utility-based shortfall risk. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to provide lower and upper bounds for estimating any risk measure beyond the mean within a Markovian setting. Our lower bounds also extend to the infinite-horizon discounted costs’ mean. Even in that case, our lower bound of $\Omega(1/\epsilon^2) $ improves upon the existing $\Omega(1/\epsilon)$ bound (Metelli et al. 2023.
Gugan Thoppe, Prashanth L. A., Sanjay P. Bhat
ICML3
2022 VidyutVanika21: An Autonomous Intelligent Broker for Smart-grids
abstract
An autonomous broker that liaises between retail customers and power-generating companies (GenCos) is essential for the smart grid ecosystem. The efficiency brought in by such brokers to the smart grid setup can be studied through a well-developed simulation environment. In this paper, we describe the design of one such energy broker called VidyutVanika21 (VV21) and analyze its performance using a simulation platform called PowerTAC (PowerTrading Agent Competition). Specifically, we discuss the retail (VV21–RM) and wholesale market (VV21–WM) modules of VV21 that help the broker achieve high net profits in a competitive setup. Supported by game-theoretic analysis, the VV21–RM designs tariff contracts that a) maintain a balanced portfolio of different types of customers; b) sustain an appropriate level of market share, and c) introduce surcharges on customers to reduce energy usage during peak demand times. The VV21–WM aims to reduce the cost of procurement by following the supply curve of the GenCo to identify its lowest ask for a particular auction which is then used to generate suitable bids. We further demonstrate the efficacy of the retail and wholesale strategies of VV21 in PowerTAC 2021 finals and through several controlled experiments.
Sanjay Chandlekar, Bala Suraj Pedasingu, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat, Praveen Paruchuri, Sujit Gujar
IJCAI4
2022 Identifying near-optimal decisions in linear-in-parameter bandit models with continuous decision sets
abstract
We consider an online optimization problem in a bandit setting in which a learner chooses decisions from a continuous decision set at discrete decision epochs, and receives noisy rewards from the environment in response. While the noise samples are assumed to be independent and sub-Gaussian, the mean reward at each epoch is a fixed but unknown linear function of a feature vector, which depends on the decision through a known (and possibly nonlinear) feature map. We study the problem within the framework of best-arm identification with fixed confidence, and provide a template algorithm for approximately learning the optimal decision in a probably approximately correct (PAC) setting. More precisely, the template algorithm samples the decision space till a stopping condition is met, and returns a subset of decisions such that, with the required confidence, every element of the subset is approximately optimal for the unknown mean reward function. We provide a sample complexity bound for the template algorithm and then specialize it to the case where the mean-reward function is a univariate polynomial of a single decision variable. We provide an implementable algorithm for this case by explicitly instantiating all the steps in the template algorithm. Finally, we provide experimental results to demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithms.
Sanjay P. Bhat, Chaitanya Amballa
UAI1
2022 A Wasserstein Distance Approach for Concentration of Empirical Risk Estimates
abstract
This paper presents a unified approach based on Wasserstein distance to derive concentration bounds for empirical estimates for two broad classes of risk measures defined in the paper. The classes of risk measures introduced include as special cases well known risk measures from the finance literature such as conditional value at risk (CVaR), optimized certainty equivalent risk, spectral risk measures, utility-based shortfall risk, cumulative prospect theory (CPT) value, rank dependent expected utility and distorted risk measures. Two estimation schemes are considered, one for each class of risk measures. One estimation scheme involves applying the risk measure to the empirical distribution function formed from a collection of i.i.d. samples of the random variable (r.v.), while the second scheme involves applying the same procedure to a truncated sample. The bounds provided apply to three popular classes of distributions, namely sub-Gaussian, sub-exponential and heavy-tailed distributions. The bounds are derived by first relating the estimation error to the Wasserstein distance between the true and empirical distributions, and then using recent concentration bounds for the latter. Previous concentration bounds are available only for specific risk measures such as CVaR and CPT-value. The bounds derived in this paper are shown to either match or improve upon previous bounds in cases where they are available. The usefulness of the bounds is illustrated through an algorithm and the corresponding regret bound for a stochastic bandit problem involving a general risk measure from each of the two classes introduced in the paper.
Prashanth L. A., Sanjay P. Bhat
J. Mach. Learn. Res.2
2021 Computing an Efficient Exploration Basis for Learning with Univariate Polynomial Features
Chaitanya Amballa, Manu K. Gupta, Sanjay P. Bhat
AAAI3
2021 Estimation of Spectral Risk Measures
abstract
We consider the problem of estimating a spectral risk measure (SRM) from i.i.d. samples, and propose a novel method that is based on numerical integration. We show that our SRM estimate concentrates exponentially, when the underlying distribution has bounded support. Further, we also consider the case when the underlying distribution satisfies an exponential moment bound, which includes sub-Gaussian and subexponential distributions. For these distributions, we derive a concentration bound for our estimation scheme. We validate the theoretical findings on a synthetic setup, and in a vehicular traffic routing application.
Ajay Kumar Pandey, Prashanth L. A., Sanjay P. Bhat
AAAI3
2020 Bidding in Smart Grid PDAs: Theory, Analysis and Strategy
abstract
Periodic Double Auctions (PDAs) are commonly used in the real world for trading, e.g. in stock markets to determine stock opening prices, and energy markets to trade energy in order to balance net demand in smart grids, involving trillions of dollars in the process. A bidder, participating in such PDAs, has to plan for bids in the current auction as well as for the future auctions, which highlights the necessity of good bidding strategies. In this paper, we perform an equilibrium analysis of single unit single-shot double auctions with a certain clearing price and payment rule, which we refer to as ACPR, and find it intractable to analyze as number of participating agents increase. We further derive the best response for a bidder with complete information in a single-shot double auction with ACPR. Leveraging the theory developed for single-shot double auction and taking the PowerTAC wholesale market PDA as our testbed, we proceed by modeling the PDA of PowerTAC as an MDP. We propose a novel bidding strategy, namely MDPLCPBS. We empirically show that MDPLCPBS follows the equilibrium strategy for double auctions that we previously analyze. In addition, we benchmark our strategy against the baseline and the state-of-the-art bidding strategies for the PowerTAC wholesale market PDAs, and show that MDPLCPBS outperforms most of them consistently.
Susobhan Ghosh, Sujit Gujar, Praveen Paruchuri, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat
AAAI5
2019 VidyutVanika: A Reinforcement Learning Based Broker Agent for a Power Trading Competition
abstract
A smart grid is an efficient and sustainable energy system that integrates diverse generation entities, distributed storage capacity, and smart appliances and buildings. A smart grid brings new kinds of participants in the energy market served by it, whose effect on the grid can only be determined through high fidelity simulations. Power TAC offers one such simulation platform using real-world weather data and complex state-of-the-art customer models. In Power TAC, autonomous energy brokers compete to make profits across tariff, wholesale and balancing markets while maintaining the stability of the grid. In this paper, we design an autonomous broker VidyutVanika, the runner-up in the 2018 Power TAC competition. VidyutVanika relies on reinforcement learning (RL) in the tariff market and dynamic programming in the wholesale market to solve modified versions of known Markov Decision Process (MDP) formulations in the respective markets. The novelty lies in defining the reward functions for MDPs, solving these MDPs, and the application of these solutions to real actions in the market. Unlike previous participating agents, VidyutVanika uses a neural network to predict the energy consumption of various customers using weather data. We use several heuristic ideas to bridge the gap between the restricted action spaces of the MDPs and the much more extensive action space available to VidyutVanika. These heuristics allow VidyutVanika to convert near-optimal fixed tariffs to time-of-use tariffs aimed at mitigating transmission capacity fees, spread out its orders across several auctions in the wholesale market to procure energy at a lower price, more accurately estimate parameters required for implementing the MDP solution in the wholesale market, and account for wholesale procurement costs while optimizing tariffs. We use Power TAC 2018 tournament data and controlled experiments to analyze the performance of VidyutVanika, and illustrate the efficacy of the above strategies.
Susobhan Ghosh, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat, Sujit Gujar, Praveen Paruchuri
AAAI3
2019 Sparse Recurrent Mixture Density Networks for Forecasting High Variability Time Series with Confidence Estimates
Narendhar Gugulothu, Easwar Subramanian, Sanjay P. Bhat
ICANN (2)3
2019 Concentration of risk measures: A Wasserstein distance approach
abstract
Known finite-sample concentration bounds for the Wasserstein distance between the empirical and true distribution of a random variable are used to derive a two-sided concentration bound for the error between the true conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of a (possibly unbounded) random variable and a standard estimate of its CVaR computed from an i.i.d. sample. The bound applies under fairly general assumptions on the random variable, and improves upon previous bounds which were either one sided, or applied only to bounded random variables. Specializations of the bound to sub-Gaussian and sub-exponential random variables are also derived. A similar procedure is followed to derive concentration bounds for the error between the true and estimated Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT) value of a random variable, in cases where the random variable is bounded or sub-Gaussian. These bounds are shown to match a known bound in the bounded case, and improve upon the known bound in the sub-Gaussian case. The usefulness of the bounds is illustrated through an algorithm, and corresponding regret bound for a stochastic bandit problem, where the underlying risk measure to be optimized is CVaR.
Sanjay P. Bhat, Prashanth L. A.
NeurIPS1
2015 Closed Rotation Sequences
Sanjay P. Bhat, Naveena Crasta
Discret. Comput. Geom.1
2013 Explicit formulas for optimal hedging stratergies for European contingent claims
abstract
In this paper, we consider the problem of discrete-time optimal hedging for a portfolio of (illiquid) European contingent claims (ECCs) written on multiple underlying assets. First, we present a framework to find discrete-time hedging strategies that minimize the variance of terminal wealth using a hedging portfolio of liquid assets, also assumed to ECCs written on the same underlying assets. Next, we specialize the framework to the case of illiquid portfolio consisting of a simple ECC written on a single underlying asset and a hedging portfolio consisting of the underlying asset and another simple ECC written on the same underlying asset. For this special case, we provide a (computable) formula for the minimum variance hedging strategy. Finally, we show that the minimum variance hedging strategy converges to the Δ-Γ-neutral hedging strategy as the interspacing between the hedging times converge to zero.
VijaySekhar Chellaboina, Anil Bhatia, Sanjay P. Bhat
CIFEr3