Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xinmiao Wu

dblp:58/949 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems
personalized ranking
0.212013
QoS Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Recommender systems
qos prediction
0.212013
QoS Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Software testing › configuration testing
configuration space sampling
0.212013
QoS Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud service management
0.012013
QoS Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2013

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

personalized prediction · 0.5collaborative filtering · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 QoS Ranking Prediction for Cloud Services
abstract
Cloud computing is becoming popular. Building high-quality cloud applications is a critical research problem. QoS rankings provide valuable information for making optimal cloud service selection from a set of functionally equivalent service candidates. To obtain QoS values, real-world invocations on the service candidates are usually required. To avoid the time-consuming and expensive real-world service invocations, this paper proposes a QoS ranking prediction framework for cloud services by taking advantage of the past service usage experiences of other consumers. Our proposed framework requires no additional invocations of cloud services when making QoS ranking prediction. Two personalized QoS ranking prediction approaches are proposed to predict the QoS rankings directly. Comprehensive experiments are conducted employing real-world QoS data, including 300 distributed users and 500 real-world web services all over the world. The experimental results show that our approaches outperform other competing approaches.
Zibin Zheng, Xinmiao Wu, Michael R. Lyu, Jianmin Wang 0013
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.2