Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Beipeng Mu
dblp:58/9804
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-9240-7964ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Autonomous driving · 32% 3D vision · 25% Segmentation and scene understanding · 14% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › vision-based perception
lane detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RATopo: Improving Lane Topology Reasoning via Redundancy Assignment · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › HD map construction
lane topology reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RATopo: Improving Lane Topology Reasoning via Redundancy Assignment · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
scene understanding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | RATopo: Improving Lane Topology Reasoning via Redundancy Assignment · ACM Multimedia 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Eliminating Cross-modal Conflicts in BEV Space for LiDAR-Camera 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › point cloud object detection
LiDAR-based 3D object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Global-Local Collaborative Inference with LLM for Lidar-Based Open-Vocabulary Detection · ECCV (35) 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
open-vocabulary object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Global-Local Collaborative Inference with LLM for Lidar-Based Open-Vocabulary Detection · ECCV (35) 2024 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › obstacle avoidance
collision-free navigation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Two-Stage Focused Inference for Resource-Constrained Minimal Collision Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2017 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › robot mapping
map representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Two-Stage Focused Inference for Resource-Constrained Minimal Collision Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › inference efficiency
resource-constrained inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Two-Stage Focused Inference for Resource-Constrained Minimal Collision Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2017 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › 3d perception
bird's-eye-view perception |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Eliminating Cross-modal Conflicts in BEV Space for LiDAR-Camera 3D Object Detection · ICRA 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Two-Stage Focused Inference for Resource-Constrained Minimal Collision Navigation · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer decoder · 0.9attention mechanism · 0.9semantic-guided flow alignment · 0.8large language model · 0.8global-local collaborative inference · 0.8dissolved query recovering · 0.8incremental selection · 0.3focused inference · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | RATopo: Improving Lane Topology Reasoning via Redundancy AssignmentabstractLane topology reasoning plays a critical role in autonomous driving by modeling the connections among lanes and the topological relationships between lanes and traffic elements. Most existing methods adopt a first-detect-then-reason paradigm, where topological relationships are supervised based on the one-to-one assignment results obtained during the detection stage. This supervision strategy results in suboptimal topology reasoning performance due to the limited range of valid supervision. In this paper, we propose RATopo, a Redundancy Assignment strategy for lane Topology reasoning that enables quantity-rich and geometry-diverse topology supervision. Specifically, we restructure the Transformer decoder by swapping the cross-attention and self-attention layers. This allows redundant lane predictions to be retained before suppression, enabling effective one-to-many assignment. We also instantiate multiple parallel cross-attention blocks with independent parameters, which further enhances the diversity of detected lanes. Extensive experiments on OpenLane-V2 demonstrate that our RATopo strategy is model-agnostic and can be seamlessly integrated into existing topology reasoning frameworks, consistently improving both lane-lane and lane-traffic topology performance (e.g., + 15.7% and + 9.5% on TopoLogic for TOP_ll and TOP_lt on OpenLane-V2 subset_B, respectively). Shaofei Huang 0001, Yulu Gao, Beipeng Mu, Si Liu 0001 |
ACM Multimedia | 5 |
| 2024 | Global-Local Collaborative Inference with LLM for Lidar-Based Open-Vocabulary Detection
Xingyu Peng, Chen Gao 0005, Lirong Yang, Beipeng Mu, Si Liu 0001 |
ECCV (35) | 6 |
| 2024 | Eliminating Cross-modal Conflicts in BEV Space for LiDAR-Camera 3D Object DetectionabstractRecent 3D object detectors typically utilize multi-sensor data and unify multi-modal features in the shared bird’s-eye view (BEV) representation space. However, our empirical findings indicate that previous methods have limitations in generating fusion BEV features free from cross-modal conflicts. These conflicts encompass extrinsic conflicts caused by BEV feature construction and inherent conflicts stemming from heterogeneous sensor signals. Therefore, we propose a novel Eliminating Conflicts Fusion (ECFusion) method to explicitly eliminate the extrinsic/inherent conflicts in BEV space and produce improved multi-modal BEV features. Specifically, we devise a Semantic-guided Flow-based Alignment (SFA) module to resolve extrinsic conflicts via unifying spatial distribution in BEV space before fusion. Moreover, we design a Dissolved Query Recovering (DQR) mechanism to remedy inherent conflicts by preserving objectness clues that are lost in the fusion BEV feature. In general, our method maximizes the effective information utilization of each modality and leverages inter-modal complementarity. Our method achieves state-of-the-art performance in the highly competitive nuScenes 3D object detection dataset. The code is released at https://github.com/fjhzhixi/ECFusion. Jiahui Fu 0003, Chen Gao 0005, Zitian Wang, Lirong Yang, Beipeng Mu, Si Liu 0001 |
ICRA | 6 |
| 2017 | Two-Stage Focused Inference for Resource-Constrained Minimal Collision NavigationabstractThe operation of mobile robots in unknown environments typically requires building maps during exploration. As the exploration time and environment size increase, the amount of data collected and the number of variables required to represent these maps both grow, which is problematic since all real robots have finite resources. The solution proposed in this paper is to only retain the variables and measurements that are most important to achieve the robot's task. The variable and measurement selection approach is demonstrated on the task of navigation with a low risk of collision. Our approach has two stages: first, a subset of the variables is selected that is most useful for minimizing the uncertainty of navigation (termed the “focused variables”). And second, a task-agnostic method is used to select a subset of the measurements that maximizes the information over these focused variables (“focused inference”). Detailed simulations and hardware experiments show that the two-stage approach constrains the number of variables and measurements. It can generate much sparser maps than existing approaches in the literature, while still achieving a better task performance-in this case (fewer collisions). An incremental and iterative approach is further presented, in which the two-stage procedure is performed on subsets of the data, and thus, avoids the necessity of performing a resource-intensive batch selection on large datasets. Beipeng Mu, Liam Paull, Ali-akbar Agha-mohammadi, John J. Leonard, Jonathan P. How |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2016 | SLAM with objects using a nonparametric pose graphabstractMapping and self-localization in unknown environments are fundamental capabilities in many robotic applications. These tasks typically involve the identification of objects as unique features or landmarks, which requires the objects both to be detected and then assigned a unique identifier that can be maintained when viewed from different perspectives and in different images. The data association and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problems are, individually, well-studied in the literature. But these two problems are inherently tightly coupled, and that has not been well-addressed. Without accurate SLAM, possible data associations are combinatorial and become intractable easily. Without accurate data association, the error of SLAM algorithms diverge easily. This paper proposes a novel nonparametric pose graph that models data association and SLAM in a single framework. An algorithm is further introduced to alternate between inferring data association and performing SLAM. Experimental results show that our approach has the new capability of associating object detections and localizing objects at the same time, leading to significantly better performance on both the data association and SLAM problems than achieved by considering only one and ignoring imperfections in the other. Beipeng Mu, Shih-Yuan Liu, Liam Paull, John J. Leonard, Jonathan P. How |
IROS | 1 |
| 2015 | Adaptive search for multi-class targets with heterogeneous importance
Beipeng Mu, Gregory E. Newstadt, Dennis L. Wei, Alfred O. Hero III, Jonathan P. How |
FUSION | 1 |