Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Catherine Yang
dblp:59/1
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Web and social media mining · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Web and social media mining
social network analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025 |
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
tie strength prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025 |
Empirical software engineering
benchmarking |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tie resilience evaluation · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 1.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength PredictionabstractThe rapid rise of online social networks underscores the need to understand the heterogeneous strengths of online relationships. Yet, efforts to assess tie strength (TS) are hindered by the lack of ground-truth labels, differing research perspectives, and limited model performance in real-world settings. To address this gap, we introduce BTS, a comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength prediction, aiming to establish a standardized foundation for evaluating and advancing TS prediction methodologies. Specifically, our contributions are: TS Pseudo-Label Techniques -- we categorize TS into seven standardized pseudo-labeling techniques based on prior literature; TS Dataset Collection -- we present a representative collection of three social networks and perform data analysis by investigating the class distributions and correlations across the generated pseudo-labels; TS Pseudo-Label Evaluation Framework -- we propose a standardized framework to evaluate the pseudo-label quality from the perspective of tie resilience; Benchmarking -- we evaluate existing tie strength prediction model performance using the BTS dataset collection, exploring the effects of different experiment settings, models, and evaluation criteria on the results. Furthermore, we derive key insights to enhance existing methods and shed light on promising directions for future research in this domain. The BTS dataset collection, along with the curation codes and experimental scripts, is all available at: https://github.com/XueqiC/Awesome-Tie-Strength-Prediction. Xueqi Cheng 0002, Catherine Yang, Yuying Zhao, Yu Wang 0160, Hamid Karimi, Tyler Derr |
KDD (2) | 2 |