Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Catherine Yang

dblp:59/1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Web and social media mining
social network analysis
0.912025
BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
tie strength prediction
0.912025
BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025
Empirical software engineering
benchmarking
0.912025
BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction · KDD (2) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tie resilience evaluation · 1.7pseudo-labeling · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 BTS: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength Prediction
abstract
The rapid rise of online social networks underscores the need to understand the heterogeneous strengths of online relationships. Yet, efforts to assess tie strength (TS) are hindered by the lack of ground-truth labels, differing research perspectives, and limited model performance in real-world settings. To address this gap, we introduce BTS, a comprehensive Benchmark for Tie Strength prediction, aiming to establish a standardized foundation for evaluating and advancing TS prediction methodologies. Specifically, our contributions are: TS Pseudo-Label Techniques -- we categorize TS into seven standardized pseudo-labeling techniques based on prior literature; TS Dataset Collection -- we present a representative collection of three social networks and perform data analysis by investigating the class distributions and correlations across the generated pseudo-labels; TS Pseudo-Label Evaluation Framework -- we propose a standardized framework to evaluate the pseudo-label quality from the perspective of tie resilience; Benchmarking -- we evaluate existing tie strength prediction model performance using the BTS dataset collection, exploring the effects of different experiment settings, models, and evaluation criteria on the results. Furthermore, we derive key insights to enhance existing methods and shed light on promising directions for future research in this domain. The BTS dataset collection, along with the curation codes and experimental scripts, is all available at: https://github.com/XueqiC/Awesome-Tie-Strength-Prediction.
Xueqi Cheng 0002, Catherine Yang, Yuying Zhao, Yu Wang 0160, Hamid Karimi, Tyler Derr
KDD (2)2