Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Markus Fritzsche

dblp:59/1451 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0002-8787-1724ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 67% Deep learning architectures and training · 33%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
3 papers
Human-robot interaction · 88% Haptics and multimodal interaction · 12%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
heuristic search
1.012026
Managing Infinite Abstractions in Numeric Pattern Database Heuristics · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning › symbolic planning
numeric planning
1.012026
Managing Infinite Abstractions in Numeric Pattern Database Heuristics · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › heuristic search › admissible heuristics
pattern databases
1.012026
Managing Infinite Abstractions in Numeric Pattern Database Heuristics · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
plan generation
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
symmetry-aware learning
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
transformer training
1.012026
Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning · AAAI 2026
Human-robot interaction
physical human-robot interaction
0.422016
A Large Scale Tactile Sensor for Safe Mobile Robot Manipulation · HRI 2016
Tactile sensing: a key technology for safe physical human robot interaction · HRI 2011
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
0.212016
Safe Human-Robot Cooperation with High-Payload Robots in Industrial Applications · HRI 2016
Human-robot interaction › safe human-robot interaction
safe physical interaction
0.112011
Tactile sensing: a key technology for safe physical human robot interaction · HRI 2011
Haptics and multimodal interaction
tactile sensing
0.122016
A Large Scale Tactile Sensor for Safe Mobile Robot Manipulation · HRI 2016
Tactile sensing: a key technology for safe physical human robot interaction · HRI 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transformer · 1.0pattern database heuristics · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0abstraction · 1.0tactile floor sensing · 0.2projection system · 0.2piezo-resistive composite sensor array · 0.2tactile sensor · 0.1artificial skin · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Managing Infinite Abstractions in Numeric Pattern Database Heuristics
abstract
Pattern Database (PDB) heuristics are an established approach in optimal classical planning that is used in state-of-the-art planning systems. PDBs are based on projections, which induce an abstraction of the original problem. Computing all cheapest plans in the abstraction yields an admissible heuristic. Despite their success, PDBs have only recently been adapted to numeric planning, which extends classical planning with numeric state variables. The difficulty in supporting numeric variables is that the induced abstractions, in contrast to classical planning, are generally infinite. Thus, they cannot be explored exhaustively to compute a heuristic. The foundational work that introduced numeric PDBs employed a simple approach that computes only a finite part of the abstraction. We analyze this framework and identify cases where it necessarily results in an uninformed heuristic. We propose several improvements over the basic variant of numeric PDBs that lead to enhanced heuristic accuracy.
Markus Fritzsche, Daniel Gnad 0001, Mikhail Gruntov, Alexander Shleyfman
AAAI1
2026 Symmetry-Aware Transformer Training for Automated Planning
abstract
While transformers excel in many settings, their application in the field of automated planning is limited. Prior work like PlanGPT, a state-of-the-art decoder-only transformer, struggles with extrapolation from easy to hard planning problems. This in turn stems from problem symmetries: planning tasks can be represented with arbitrary variable names that carry no meaning beyond being identifiers. This causes a combinatorial explosion of equivalent representations that pure transformers cannot efficiently learn from. We propose a novel contrastive learning objective to make transformers symmetry-aware and thereby compensate for their lack of inductive bias. Combining this with architectural improvements, we show that transformers can be efficiently trained for either plan-generation or heuristic-prediction. Our results across multiple planning domains demonstrate that our symmetry-aware training effectively and efficiently addresses the limitations of PlanGPT.
Markus Fritzsche, Elliot Gestrin, Jendrik Seipp
AAAI1
2016 A Large Scale Tactile Sensor for Safe Mobile Robot Manipulation
abstract
In this paper we exemplarily outline the application of a large scale tactile sensor to provide tactile perception to a mobile robot. The tactile sensors used within this project1are composed of piezo-resistive composite material sandwiched between two electrodes and arranged as sensor array. Based upon this approach, large 3D-shaped sensor covers that could be directly applied to the robots geometry were created. To simplify interpretation of sensor data, two major modes of operation have been implemented for the mobile robot: In autonomous mode, the tactile sensor acts as a safety collision sensor. In interaction mode touch and gestures on the robot surface are interpreted as interaction metaphors which allow intuitive human robot interaction. The sensor setup and integration will be described and the results of the experimental evaluation will be outlined.
Markus Fritzsche, José F. Saenz, Felix Penzlin
HRI1
2016 Safe Human-Robot Cooperation with High-Payload Robots in Industrial Applications
abstract
In this contribution we present an innovative and trendsetting solution for safeguarding human-robot cooperative workplaces with high-payload robots through a combination of safeguarding technologies addressing both hard1- and soft2- safety considerations. This consists of a tactile floor with spatial resolution as a hard- safety sensor for workspace monitoring together with a projection system as a soft- safety component to visualize the boundaries of the safety zones. This safety concept is capable of establishing both manually defined safety zones and dynamically generated safety zones that are based on the current robot's joint positions and velocities, thus offering a maximum of free space around the robot to the user. The paper aims on introducing the novel safety concept and will briefly describe the development of the underlying technologies.
Christian Vogel 0003, Markus Fritzsche, Norbert Elkmann
HRI2
2011 Tactile sensing: a key technology for safe physical human robot interaction
abstract
Human-robot interaction in a shared workspace permits and often even requires physical contact between humans and robots. A key technology to ensure that physical human robot interaction is safe is to monitor contact forces by providing the robot with a tactile sensor as an artificial skin.
Markus Fritzsche, Norbert Elkmann, Erik Schulenburg
HRI1