Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Song Park
dblp:59/1462
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
4as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-4332-9733ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 4 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 22 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visual content generation and editing › font generation
few-shot font generation |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | Few-Shot Font Generation With Weakly Supervised Localized Representations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Multiple Heads are Better than One: Few-shot Font Generation with Multiple Localized Experts · ICCV 2021 Few-shot Font Generation with Localized Style Representations and Factorization · AAAI 2021 |
Visual content generation and editing
font generation |
1.8 | 3 | 2024 | Few-Shot Font Generation With Weakly Supervised Localized Representations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Multiple Heads are Better than One: Few-shot Font Generation with Multiple Localized Experts · ICCV 2021 Few-shot Font Generation with Localized Style Representations and Factorization · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › disentangled representation learning
style-content disentanglement |
1.4 | 3 | 2024 | Few-Shot Font Generation With Weakly Supervised Localized Representations · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Multiple Heads are Better than One: Few-shot Font Generation with Multiple Localized Experts · ICCV 2021 Few-shot Font Generation with Localized Style Representations and Factorization · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning
probabilistic embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-Training · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-Training · ICLR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-Training · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › zero-shot learning
zero-shot classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-Training · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability · ECCV (68) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial transferability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability · ECCV (68) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
efficient training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SeiT++: Masked Token Modeling Improves Storage-Efficient Training · ECCV (28) 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning › masked modeling
masked token prediction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | SeiT++: Masked Token Modeling Improves Storage-Efficient Training · ECCV (28) 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
positional encoding |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformer · ECCV (10) 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformer · ECCV (10) 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SeiT: Storage-Efficient Vision Training with Tokens Using 1% of Pixel Storage · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
large-scale image classification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SeiT: Storage-Efficient Vision Training with Tokens Using 1% of Pixel Storage · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
image captioning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCO · ECCV (8) 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Multiple Heads are Better than One: Few-shot Font Generation with Multiple Localized Experts · ICCV 2021 |
Information retrieval
evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCO · ECCV (8) 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Few-shot Font Generation with Localized Style Representations and Factorization · AAAI 2021 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design
arithmetic circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Carry-Save Representation Is Shift-Unsafe: The Problem and Its Solution · IEEE Trans. Computers 2006 |
Electronic design automation
carry-save representation |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Carry-Save Representation Is Shift-Unsafe: The Problem and Its Solution · IEEE Trans. Computers 2006 |
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.1 | 1 | 2006 | Carry-Save Representation Is Shift-Unsafe: The Problem and Its Solution · IEEE Trans. Computers 2006 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
low-rank matrix factorization · 2.5weakly supervised learning · 1.5inclusion loss · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9rotary position embedding · 0.8masked token modeling · 0.8adversarial attack transferability · 0.8token augmentation · 0.7stem-adaptor · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.7machine-and-human verification · 0.6weak supervision · 0.5hungarian algorithm · 0.5graph matching · 0.5adversarial loss · 0.5arithmetic right shift analysis · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-TrainingabstractVision-language models (VLMs) embed aligned image-text pairs into a joint space but often rely on deterministic embeddings, assuming a one-to-one correspondence between images and texts. This oversimplifies real-world relationships, which are inherently many-to-many, with multiple captions describing a single image and vice versa. We introduce Probabilistic Language-Image Pre-training (ProLIP), the first probabilistic VLM pre-trained on a billion-scale image-text dataset using only probabilistic objectives, achieving a strong zero-shot capability (e.g., 74.6% ImageNet zero-shot accuracy with ViT-B/16). ProLIP efficiently estimates uncertainty by an ``uncertainty token'' without extra parameters. We also introduce a novel inclusion loss that enforces distributional inclusion relationships between image-text pairs and between original and masked inputs. Experiments demonstrate that, by leveraging uncertainty estimates, ProLIP benefits downstream tasks and aligns with intuitive notions of uncertainty, e.g., shorter texts being more uncertain and more general inputs including specific ones. Utilizing text uncertainties, we further improve ImageNet accuracy from 74.6% to 75.8% (under a few-shot setting), supporting the practical advantages of our probabilistic approach. The code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/prolip Sanghyuk Chun, Wonjae Kim, Song Park, Sangdoo Yun |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2024 | Rotary Position Embedding for Vision Transformer
Byeongho Heo, Song Park, Dongyoon Han, Sangdoo Yun |
ECCV (10) | 2 |
| 2024 | Similarity of Neural Architectures Using Adversarial Attack Transferability
Jaehui Hwang, Dongyoon Han, Byeongho Heo, Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Jong-Seok Lee |
ECCV (68) | 4 |
| 2024 | SeiT++: Masked Token Modeling Improves Storage-Efficient Training
Minhyun Lee, Song Park, Byeongho Heo, Dongyoon Han, Hyunjung Shim |
ECCV (28) | 2 |
| 2024 | Few-Shot Font Generation With Weakly Supervised Localized RepresentationsabstractAutomatic few-shot font generation aims to solve a well-defined, real-world problem because manual font designs are expensive and sensitive to the expertise of designers. Existing methods learn to disentangle style and content elements by developing a universal style representation for each font style. However, this approach limits the model in representing diverse local styles because it is unsuitable for complicated letter systems. For example, Chinese characters consist of a varying number of components (often called "radical") with a highly complex structure. In this paper, we propose a novel font generation method that learns localized styles, namely component-wise style representations, instead of universal styles. The proposed style representations enable synthesizing complex local details in text designs. However, learning component-wise styles solely from a few reference glyphs is infeasible when a target script has a large number of components, for example, over 200 for Chinese. To reduce the number of required reference glyphs, we represent component-wise styles by a product of component and style factors inspired by low-rank matrix factorization. Owing to the combination of strong representation and a compact factorization strategy, our method shows remarkably better few-shot font generation results (with only eight reference glyphs) than other state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, strong locality supervision was not utilized, such as the location of each component, skeleton, or strokes. The source code is available at https://github.com/clovaai/lffont. Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Junbum Cha, Bado Lee, Hyunjung Shim |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 1 |
| 2023 | SeiT: Storage-Efficient Vision Training with Tokens Using 1% of Pixel StorageabstractWe need billion-scale images to achieve more generalizable and ground-breaking vision models, as well as massive dataset storage to ship the images (e.g., the LAION-5B dataset needs 240TB storage space). However, it has become challenging to deal with unlimited dataset storage with limited storage infrastructure. A number of storage-efficient training methods have been proposed to tackle the problem, but they are rarely scalable or suffer from severe damage to performance. In this paper, we propose a storage-efficient training strategy for vision classifiers for large-scale datasets (e.g., ImageNet) that only uses 1024 tokens per instance without using the raw level pixels; our token storage only needs <1% of the original JPEG-compressed raw pixels. We also propose token augmentations and a Stem-adaptor module to make our approach able to use the same architecture as pixel-based approaches with only minimal modifications on the stem layer and the carefully tuned optimization settings. Our experimental results on ImageNet-1k show that our method significantly outperforms other storage-efficient training methods with a large gap. We further show the effectiveness of our method in other practical scenarios, storage-efficient pre-training, and continual learning. Code is available at https://github.com/naver-ai/seit. Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Byeongho Heo, Wonjae Kim, Sangdoo Yun |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2022 | ECCV Caption: Correcting False Negatives by Collecting Machine-and-Human-verified Image-Caption Associations for MS-COCO
Sanghyuk Chun, Wonjae Kim, Song Park, Minsuk Chang, Seong Joon Oh |
ECCV (8) | 3 |
| 2021 | Few-shot Font Generation with Localized Style Representations and FactorizationabstractAutomatic few-shot font generation is a practical and widely studied problem because manual designs are expensive and sensitive to the expertise of designers. Existing few-shot font generation methods aim to learn to disentangle the style and content element from a few reference glyphs, and mainly focus on a universal style representation for each font style. However, such approach limits the model in representing diverse local styles, and thus makes it unsuitable to the most complicated letter system, e.g., Chinese, whose characters consist of a varying number of components (often called ``radical'') with a highly complex structure. In this paper, we propose a novel font generation method by learning localized styles, namely component-wise style representations, instead of universal styles. The proposed style representations enable us to synthesize complex local details in text designs. However, learning component-wise styles solely from reference glyphs is infeasible in the few-shot font generation scenario, when a target script has a large number of components, e.g., over 200 for Chinese. To reduce the number of reference glyphs, we simplify component-wise styles by a product of component factor and style factor, inspired by low-rank matrix factorization. Thanks to the combination of strong representation and a compact factorization strategy, our method shows remarkably better few-shot font generation results (with only 8 reference glyph images) than other state-of-the-arts, without utilizing strong locality supervision, e.g., location of each component, skeleton, or strokes. The source code is available at https://github.com/clovaai/lffont. Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Junbum Cha, Bado Lee, Hyunjung Shim |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Multiple Heads are Better than One: Few-shot Font Generation with Multiple Localized ExpertsabstractA few-shot font generation (FFG) method has to satisfy two objectives: the generated images should preserve the underlying global structure of the target character and present the diverse local reference style. Existing FFG methods aim to disentangle content and style either by extracting a universal representation style or extracting multiple component-wise style representations. However, previous methods either fail to capture diverse local styles or cannot be generalized to a character with unseen components, e.g., unseen language systems. To mitigate the issues, we propose a novel FFG method, named Multiple Localized Experts Few-shot Font Generation Network (MX-Font). MX-Font extracts multiple style features not explicitly conditioned on component labels, but automatically by multiple experts to represent different local concepts, e.g., left-side sub-glyph. Owing to the multiple experts, MX-Font can capture diverse local concepts and show the generalizability to unseen languages. During training, we utilize component labels as weak supervision to guide each expert to be specialized for different local concepts. We formulate the component assign problem to each expert as the graph matching problem, and solve it by the Hungarian algorithm. We also employ the independence loss and the content-style adversarial loss to impose the content-style disentanglement. In our experiments, MX-Font outperforms previous state-of-the-art FFG methods in the Chinese generation and cross-lingual, e.g., Chinese to Korean, generation. Source code is available at https://github.com/clovaai/mxfont. Song Park, Sanghyuk Chun, Junbum Cha, Bado Lee, Hyunjung Shim |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2019 | Semantic-aware neural style transfer
Joo-Hyun Park, Song Park, Hyunjung Shim |
Image Vis. Comput. | 2 |
| 2006 | Carry-Save Representation Is Shift-Unsafe: The Problem and Its SolutionabstractSeveral arithmetic circuits use carry-save (CS) representation of signed numbers in one's complement or two's complement. However, arithmetic right shifts of the CS form may generate incorrect results. This work presents the problem and proposes a simple solution to keep the correct CS representation of signed numbers when arithmetic right-shift operations or sign extensions are required. The authors discuss why the problem does not occur in most of the traditional implementations of arithmetic circuits and also emphasize that it may happen for some types of arithmetic algorithm and arithmetic hardware design. Alexandre F. Tenca, Song Park, Lo'ai Ali Tawalbeh |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 2 |