Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yizhen Zhang 0004

dblp:59/2147-4 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2836-2666ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Deep learning architectures and training · 44% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% Image recognition and object detection · 17%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
convolutional neural network
0.712023
A Dual-Stream Neural Network Explains the Functional Segregation of Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways in Human Brains · NeurIPS 2023
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.722018
Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognition · NeurIPS 2018
Deep Predictive Coding Network for Object Recognition · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › biologically plausible learning
predictive coding networks
0.722018
Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognition · NeurIPS 2018
Deep Predictive Coding Network for Object Recognition · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
two-stream network
0.712023
A Dual-Stream Neural Network Explains the Functional Segregation of Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways in Human Brains · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning
0.512021
Explainable Semantic Space by Grounding Language to Vision with Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
cross-modal representation learning
0.512021
Explainable Semantic Space by Grounding Language to Vision with Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language pretraining
0.512021
Explainable Semantic Space by Grounding Language to Vision with Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
biologically inspired neural network
0.312018
Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognition · NeurIPS 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.312018
Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognition · NeurIPS 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312018
Deep Predictive Coding Network for Object Recognition · ICML 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology
neuroscience
0.212023
A Dual-Stream Neural Network Explains the Functional Segregation of Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways in Human Brains · NeurIPS 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › visual cortex
visual cortex modeling
0.212023
A Dual-Stream Neural Network Explains the Functional Segregation of Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways in Human Brains · NeurIPS 2023
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › argumentation
grounded semantics
0.112021
Explainable Semantic Space by Grounding Language to Vision with Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

linear transformation · 1.3convolutional neural network · 1.3cross-modal attention · 0.5contrastive learning · 0.5bilinear operator · 0.5recurrent computation · 0.3predictive coding · 0.3local recurrent processing · 0.3feedback connections · 0.3bottom-up error · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Human Eyes-Inspired Recurrent Neural Networks Are More Robust Against Adversarial Noises
abstract
Humans actively observe the visual surroundings by focusing on salient objects and ignoring trivial details. However, computer vision models based on convolutional neural networks (CNN) often analyze visual input all at once through a single feedforward pass. In this study, we designed a dual-stream vision model inspired by the human brain. This model features retina-like input layers and includes two streams: one determining the next point of focus (the fixation), while the other interprets the visuals surrounding the fixation. Trained on image recognition, this model examines an image through a sequence of fixations, each time focusing on different parts, thereby progressively building a representation of the image. We evaluated this model against various benchmarks in terms of object recognition, gaze behavior, and adversarial robustness. Our findings suggest that the model can attend and gaze in ways similar to humans without being explicitly trained to mimic human attention and that the model can enhance robustness against adversarial attacks due to its retinal sampling and recurrent processing. In particular, the model can correct its perceptual errors by taking more glances, setting itself apart from all feedforward-only models. In conclusion, the interactions of retinal sampling, eye movement, and recurrent dynamics are important to human-like visual exploration and inference.
Yizhen Zhang 0004, Kuan Han, Zhongming Liu
Neural Comput.2
2023 A Dual-Stream Neural Network Explains the Functional Segregation of Dorsal and Ventral Visual Pathways in Human Brains
abstract
The human visual system uses two parallel pathways for spatial processing and object recognition. In contrast, computer vision systems tend to use a single feedforward pathway, rendering them less robust, adaptive, or efficient than human vision. To bridge this gap, we developed a dual-stream vision model inspired by the human eyes and brain. At the input level, the model samples two complementary visual patterns to mimic how the human eyes use magnocellular and parvocellular retinal ganglion cells to separate retinal inputs to the brain. At the backend, the model processes the separate input patterns through two branches of convolutional neural networks (CNN) to mimic how the human brain uses the dorsal and ventral cortical pathways for parallel visual processing. The first branch (WhereCNN) samples a global view to learn spatial attention and control eye movements. The second branch (WhatCNN) samples a local view to represent the object around the fixation. Over time, the two branches interact recurrently to build a scene representation from moving fixations. We compared this model with the human brains processing the same movie and evaluated their functional alignment by linear transformation. The WhereCNN and WhatCNN branches were found to differentially match the dorsal and ventral pathways of the visual cortex, respectively, primarily due to their different learning objectives, rather than their distinctions in retinal sampling or sensitivity to attention-driven eye movements. These model-based results lead us to speculate that the distinct responses and representations of the ventral and dorsal streams are more influenced by their distinct goals in visual attention and object recognition than by their specific bias or selectivity in retinal inputs. This dual-stream model takes a further step in brain-inspired computer vision, enabling parallel neural networks to actively explore and understand the visual surroundings.
Kuan Han, Yizhen Zhang 0004, Zhongming Liu
NeurIPS4
2021 Explainable Semantic Space by Grounding Language to Vision with Cross-Modal Contrastive Learning
abstract
In natural language processing, most models try to learn semantic representations merely from texts. The learned representations encode the “distributional semantics” but fail to connect to any knowledge about the physical world. In contrast, humans learn language by grounding concepts in perception and action and the brain encodes “grounded semantics” for cognition. Inspired by this notion and recent work in vision-language learning, we design a two-stream model for grounding language learning in vision. The model includes a VGG-based visual stream and a Bert-based language stream. The two streams merge into a joint representational space. Through cross-modal contrastive learning, the model first learns to align visual and language representations with the MS COCO dataset. The model further learns to retrieve visual objects with language queries through a cross-modal attention module and to infer the visual relations between the retrieved objects through a bilinear operator with the Visual Genome dataset. After training, the model’s language stream is a stand-alone language model capable of embedding concepts in a visually grounded semantic space. This semantic space manifests principal dimensions explainable with human intuition and neurobiological knowledge. Word embeddings in this semantic space are predictive of human-defined norms of semantic features and are segregated into perceptually distinctive clusters. Furthermore, the visually grounded language model also enables compositional language understanding based on visual knowledge and multimodal image search with queries based on images, texts, or their combinations.
Yizhen Zhang 0004, Kuan Han, Zhongming Liu
NeurIPS1
2018 Deep Predictive Coding Network for Object Recognition
abstract
Based on the predictive coding theory in neuro- science, we designed a bi-directional and recur- rent neural net, namely deep predictive coding networks (PCN), that has feedforward, feedback, and recurrent connections. Feedback connections from a higher layer carry the prediction of its lower-layer representation; feedforward connec- tions carry the prediction errors to its higher-layer. Given image input, PCN runs recursive cycles of bottom-up and top-down computation to update its internal representations and reduce the differ- ence between bottom-up input and top-down pre- diction at every layer. After multiple cycles of recursive updating, the representation is used for image classification. With benchmark datasets (CIFAR-10/100, SVHN, and MNIST), PCN was found to always outperform its feedforward-only counterpart: a model without any mechanism for recurrent dynamics, and its performance tended to improve given more cycles of computation over time. In short, PCN reuses a single architecture to recursively run bottom-up and top-down pro- cesses to refine its representation towards more accurate and definitive object recognition.
Haiguang Wen, Kuan Han, Junxing Shi, Yizhen Zhang 0004, Eugenio Culurciello, Zhongming Liu
ICML4
2018 Deep Predictive Coding Network with Local Recurrent Processing for Object Recognition
abstract
Inspired by "predictive coding" - a theory in neuroscience, we develop a bi-directional and dynamic neural network with local recurrent processing, namely predictive coding network (PCN). Unlike feedforward-only convolutional neural networks, PCN includes both feedback connections, which carry top-down predictions, and feedforward connections, which carry bottom-up errors of prediction. Feedback and feedforward connections enable adjacent layers to interact locally and recurrently to refine representations towards minimization of layer-wise prediction errors. When unfolded over time, the recurrent processing gives rise to an increasingly deeper hierarchy of non-linear transformation, allowing a shallow network to dynamically extend itself into an arbitrarily deep network. We train and test PCN for image classification with SVHN, CIFAR and ImageNet datasets. Despite notably fewer layers and parameters, PCN achieves competitive performance compared to classical and state-of-the-art models. Further analysis shows that the internal representations in PCN converge over time and yield increasingly better accuracy in object recognition. Errors of top-down prediction also reveal visual saliency or bottom-up attention.
Kuan Han, Haiguang Wen, Yizhen Zhang 0004, Di Fu, Eugenio Culurciello, Zhongming Liu
NeurIPS3