EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Romesh M. Jessani
dblp:59/2440
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1998
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Integrated circuit design · 61% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 30% Energy-efficient computing · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Integrated circuit design
digital circuit design |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Comparison of Single- and Dual-Pass Multiply-Add Fused Floating-Point Units · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Integrated circuit design › digital circuit design › arithmetic circuit design
floating-point unit |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Comparison of Single- and Dual-Pass Multiply-Add Fused Floating-Point Units · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture › computer arithmetic › floating-point arithmetic
fused multiply-add |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Comparison of Single- and Dual-Pass Multiply-Add Fused Floating-Point Units · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Energy-efficient computing
low-power design |
0.0 | 1 | 1998 | Comparison of Single- and Dual-Pass Multiply-Add Fused Floating-Point Units · IEEE Trans. Computers 1998 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
area and performance comparison · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | Comparison of Single- and Dual-Pass Multiply-Add Fused Floating-Point UnitsabstractLow power, low cost, and high performance factors dictate the design of many microprocessors targeted to the low power computing market. The floating point unit occupies a significant percentage of the silicon area in a microprocessor due its wide data bandwidth (for double precision computations) and the area occupied by the multiply array. For microprocessors designed for portable products, the design site of the floating point unit plays an important role in the low cost factor driven by reduced chip area. Some microprocessors have multiply-add fused floating point units with a reduced multiply array, requiring two passes through the array for operations involving double precision multiplies. The paper discusses the design complexities around the dual pass multiply array and its effect on area and performance. Floating point unit areas and their associated multiply array areas are compared for a single and dual pass implementation in a given technology (PowerPC 604eTM and PowerPC 603eTM microprocessors, respectively). Romesh M. Jessani, Michael Putrino |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 1 |
| 1994 | The PowerPC 603TM Microprocessor: An Array Built-In Self-Test MechanismabstractThe PowerPC 603 microprocessor is designed for low power, low cost computing applications. A RAM built-in-self-test (BIST) implementation tests the split 8k instruction and data caches and the tag arrays. The design is constrained by the need to minimize area overhead while providing high test coverage and rapid at-speed testing. The solution encompasses a novel state machine design built using logic synthesis tools. This paper presents the RAM BIST design implemented on the PowerPC 603 microprocessor. Craig Hunter, Jeff Slaton, Jim Eno, Romesh M. Jessani, Carl Dietz |
ITC | 4 |