Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srinivasa Konala
dblp:59/3560
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 83% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 17% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
FPGA logic block testing |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA architecture |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996 |
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › FPGA architecture
look-up table design |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reconfiguration · 0.0built-in self-test · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic BlocksabstractWe present a new approach for FPGA testing that exploits the reprogrammability of FPGAs to create Built-In Self-Test (BIST) logic only during off-line test. As a result, BIST is achieved without area or performance penalties to the system function implemented by the FPGA, since the FPGA is reconfigured for normal system operation. An analysis of Look-Up Table (LUT) based FGPA architectures yields a general expression for the number of test sessions and establishes the bounds on FPGA logic resources required to minimize the number of BIST configurations required to completely test all of the programmable logic blocks of an FPGA. Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici |
FPGA | 3 |
| 1996 | Using ILA Testing for BIST in FPGAsabstractWe present an improved Built-In Self-Test (BIST) approach for the programmable logic blocks (PLBs) of a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), which repeatedly reconfigures the FPGA as a group of C-testable iterative logic arrays. The new architecture is easily scalable with increasing size of FPGAs and ensures routability of the various configurations required to completely test the FPGA in three test sessions. In addition, the BIST approach addresses RAM mode testing as well as testing the adder/subtractor modes in FPGAs. Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici |
ITC | 3 |
| 1996 | Built-in self-test of logic blocks in FPGAs (Finally, a free lunch: BIST without overhead!)abstractWe present a new approach for Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) testing that exploits the reprogrammability of FPGAs to create Built-In Self-Test (BIST) logic only during off-line test. As a result, BIST is achieved without any area overhead or performance penalties to the system function implemented by the FPGA. Our approach is applicable to all levels of testing, achieves maximal fault coverage, and all tests are applied at-speed. We describe the BIST architecture used to test all the programmable logic blocks in an FPGA and the configurations required to implement our approach using a commercial FPGA. We also discuss implementation problems caused by CAD tool limitations and limited architectural resources, and we describe techniques which overcome these limitations. Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici |
VTS | 2 |