Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Srinivasa Konala

dblp:59/3560 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1996
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 83% Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs · 17%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test
0.011996
Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › VLSI testing
FPGA logic block testing
0.011996
Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011996
Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs
FPGA architecture
0.011996
Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996
Reconfigurable computing and FPGAs › FPGA architecture
look-up table design
0.011996
Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks · FPGA 1996

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reconfiguration · 0.0built-in self-test · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1996 Evaluation of FPGA Resources for Built-In Self-Test of Programmable Logic Blocks
abstract
We present a new approach for FPGA testing that exploits the reprogrammability of FPGAs to create Built-In Self-Test (BIST) logic only during off-line test. As a result, BIST is achieved without area or performance penalties to the system function implemented by the FPGA, since the FPGA is reconfigured for normal system operation. An analysis of Look-Up Table (LUT) based FGPA architectures yields a general expression for the number of test sessions and establishes the bounds on FPGA logic resources required to minimize the number of BIST configurations required to completely test all of the programmable logic blocks of an FPGA.
Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici
FPGA3
1996 Using ILA Testing for BIST in FPGAs
abstract
We present an improved Built-In Self-Test (BIST) approach for the programmable logic blocks (PLBs) of a Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), which repeatedly reconfigures the FPGA as a group of C-testable iterative logic arrays. The new architecture is easily scalable with increasing size of FPGAs and ensures routability of the various configurations required to completely test the FPGA in three test sessions. In addition, the BIST approach addresses RAM mode testing as well as testing the adder/subtractor modes in FPGAs.
Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici
ITC3
1996 Built-in self-test of logic blocks in FPGAs (Finally, a free lunch: BIST without overhead!)
abstract
We present a new approach for Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) testing that exploits the reprogrammability of FPGAs to create Built-In Self-Test (BIST) logic only during off-line test. As a result, BIST is achieved without any area overhead or performance penalties to the system function implemented by the FPGA. Our approach is applicable to all levels of testing, achieves maximal fault coverage, and all tests are applied at-speed. We describe the BIST architecture used to test all the programmable logic blocks in an FPGA and the configurations required to implement our approach using a commercial FPGA. We also discuss implementation problems caused by CAD tool limitations and limited architectural resources, and we describe techniques which overcome these limitations.
Charles E. Stroud, Srinivasa Konala, Miron Abramovici
VTS2