Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Guilherme Vale Menezes
dblp:59/4842
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Empirical software engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational social science and digital humanities
scientometrics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | A geographical analysis of knowledge production in computer science · WWW 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
social network analysis · 0.2complex networks · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Minimal perfect hashing: A competitive method for indexing internal memory
Fabiano C. Botelho, Anísio Lacerda, Guilherme Vale Menezes, Nivio Ziviani |
Inf. Sci. | 3 |
| 2010 | Demand-Driven Tag Recommendation
Guilherme Vale Menezes, Jussara M. Almeida, Fabiano Muniz Belém, Marcos André Gonçalves, Anísio Lacerda, Edleno Silva de Moura, Gisele L. Pappa, Adriano Veloso, Nivio Ziviani |
ECML/PKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2009 | A geographical analysis of knowledge production in computer scienceabstractWe analyze knowledge production in Computer Science by means of coauthorship networks. For this, we consider 30 graduate programs of different regions of the world, being 8 programs in Brazil, 16 in North America (3 in Canada and 13 in the United States), and 6 in Europe (2 in France, 1 in Switzerland and 3 in the United Kingdom). We use a dataset that consists of 176,537 authors and 352,766 publication entries distributed among 2,176 publication venues. The results obtained for different metrics of collaboration social networks indicate the process of knowledge creation has changed differently for each region. Research is increasingly done in teams across different fields of Computer Science. The size of the giant component indicates the existence of isolated collaboration groups in the European network, contrasting to the degree of connectivity found in the Brazilian and North-American counterparts. We also analyzed the temporal evolution of the social networks representing the three regions. The number of authors per paper experienced an increase in a time span of 12 years. We observe that the number of collaborations between authors grows faster than the number of authors, benefiting from the existing network structure. The temporal evolution shows differences between well-established fields, such as Databases and Computer Architecture, and emerging fields, like Bioinformatics and Geoinformatics. The patterns of collaboration analyzed in this paper contribute to an overall understanding of Computer Science research in different geographical regions that could not be achieved without the use of complex networks and a large publication database. Guilherme Vale Menezes, Nivio Ziviani, Alberto H. F. Laender, Virgílio A. F. Almeida |
WWW | 1 |