Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Neeraj Arora

dblp:59/4993 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Multi-agent systems · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining
pattern mining
0.412019
Discovering Temporal Patterns from Insurance Interaction Data · AAAI 2019
Data mining › pattern mining
temporal pattern mining
0.412019
Discovering Temporal Patterns from Insurance Interaction Data · AAAI 2019
Data mining › sequence analysis
event sequence analysis
0.112019
Discovering Temporal Patterns from Insurance Interaction Data · AAAI 2019
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design
coalition formation
0.011998
Using limited information to enhance group stability · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1998
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction
0.011997
Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 1997

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

game theory · 0.0preference negotiation · 0.0constraint solving · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Workflow scheduling using particle swarm optimization and gray wolf optimization algorithm in cloud computing
abstract
Abstract Cloud computing is one of the emerging technologies in computer science in which services are provided through the internet on‐demand. Workflow scheduling is considered to be an NP‐hard problem and has a significant issue in the cloud environment. Finding the polynomial‐time solutions for workflow scheduling problem is difficult with most of the existing algorithms designed for traditional computing platforms. Some existing meta‐heuristics algorithms proposed for workflow scheduling problem are stuck in the local optimal solution and fails to give the global optimal solution. In this article, a hybrid of particle swarm optimization and gray wolf optimization, named the PSO‐GWO algorithm, is proposed for workflow scheduling. The proposed algorithm was tested to reduce the total executing cost (TEC) and total execution time (TET) of the dependent tasks in the cloud computing environment. The proposed algorithm takes advantage of both the standard PSO and GWO algorithms and does not stick in the local optimal solution. The experiment results show that the PSO‐GWO outperformed compared with the standard PSO and GWO algorithm in TEC and TET.
Neeraj Arora, Rohitash Kumar Banyal
Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp.1
2019 Discovering Temporal Patterns from Insurance Interaction Data
abstract
In the insurance industry, timely and effective interaction with customers are at the core of everyday operations and processes that are key for a satisfactory customer experience. These interactions often result in sequences of data derived from events that occur over time. Such recurrent patterns can provide valuable information that can be used in a variety of ways to improve customer related work-flows. In this paper we demonstrate the application of a recently proposed algorithm to uncover such time patterns that takes into account the time between events to form such patterns. We use temporal customer data generated from two different use-cases (satisfaction and fraud) to show that this algorithm successfully detects patterns that occur in the insurance context.
Maleeha Qazi, Srinivas Tunuguntla, Peng Lee, Teja Kanchinadam, Glenn Fung, Neeraj Arora
AAAI6
1998 Using limited information to enhance group stability
Sandip Sen, Neeraj Arora, Shounak Roychowdhury
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2
1997 Satisfying user preferences while negotiating meetings
Sandip Sen, Thomas Haynes, Neeraj Arora
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.3