BACKGROUND: Gene set analysis methods have played a major role in generating biological interpretations of omics data such as gene expression datasets. However, most methods focus on detecting homogenous pattern changes in mean expression while methods detecting pattern changes in variance remain poorly explored. While a few studies attempted to use gene-level variance analysis, such approach remains under-utilized. When comparing two phenotypes, gene sets with distinct changes in subgroups under one phenotype are overlooked by available methods although they reflect meaningful biological differences between two phenotypes. Multivariate sample-level variance analysis methods are needed to detect such pattern changes. RESULTS: We used ranking schemes based on minimum spanning tree to generalize the Cramer-Von Mises and Anderson-Darling univariate statistics into multivariate gene set analysis methods to detect differential sample variance or mean. We characterized the detection power and Type I error rate of these methods in addition to two methods developed earlier using simulation results with different parameters. We applied the developed methods to microarray gene expression dataset of prednisolone-resistant and prednisolone-sensitive children diagnosed with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia and bulk RNA-sequencing gene expression dataset of benign hyperplastic polyps and potentially malignant sessile serrated adenoma/polyps. One or both of the two compared phenotypes in each of these datasets have distinct molecular subtypes that contribute to within phenotype variability and to heterogeneous differences between two compared phenotypes. Our results show that methods designed to detect differential sample variance provide meaningful biological interpretations by detecting specific hallmark gene sets associated with the two compared phenotypes as documented in available literature. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate the usefulness of methods designed to detect differential sample variance in providing biological interpretations when biologically relevant but heterogeneous changes between two phenotypes are prevalent in specific signaling pathways. Software implementation of the methods is available with detailed documentation from Bioconductor package GSAR. The available methods are applicable to gene expression datasets in a normalized matrix form and could be used with other omics datasets in a normalized matrix form with available collection of feature sets.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in analyzing text data from different scientific fields. The significant advancement of Artificial Intelligence in Natural Language Processing enables a systematic categorization of the wealth of scientific papers into fundamental thematic clusters. In this context, topic modeling is playing a crucial role. Unfortunately, the comparative analysis between traditional and advanced topic modeling methods, including well-established techniques like Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and newer approaches like BERTopic, remains significantly underexplored. This study addresses this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis of extensive text data focused on sustainable energy research. To achieve this, we compile a unique dataset consisting of thousands of abstracts sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Our analysis involves a comparison between LDA and the transformer model BERTopic. Importantly, we introduce a novel approach to determine the optimal number of topics, achieved through the maximization of combined semantic scores, and show that the number of topics is considerably lower than from previous approaches. Overall, our study not only contributes methodologically but also enhances our understanding of the principal topics in sustainable energy research.

Large-scale perturbation databases, such as Connectivity Map (CMap) or Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS), provide enormous opportunities for computational pharmacogenomics and drug design. A reason for this is that in contrast to classical pharmacology focusing at one target at a time, the transcriptomics profiles provided by CMap and LINCS open the door for systems biology approaches on the pathway and network level. In this article, we provide a review of recent developments in computational pharmacogenomics with respect to CMap and LINCS and related applications.

Briefings in Bioinformatics (2017) doi: 10.1093/bib/bbw112 In the article above, the last name of ‘Galina Glazko’ was misspelled as ‘Galina Galzko’. The name has been corrected online and in print. The authors apologize for this error.

BACKGROUND: Gene set analysis (in a form of functionally related genes or pathways) has become the method of choice for analyzing omics data in general and gene expression data in particular. There are many statistical methods that either summarize gene-level statistics for a gene set or apply a multivariate statistic that accounts for intergene correlations. Most available methods detect complex departures from the null hypothesis but lack the ability to identify the specific alternative hypothesis that rejects the null. RESULTS: GSAR (Gene Set Analysis in R) is an open-source R/Bioconductor software package for gene set analysis (GSA). It implements self-contained multivariate non-parametric statistical methods testing a complex null hypothesis against specific alternatives, such as differences in mean (shift), variance (scale), or net correlation structure. The package also provides a graphical visualization tool, based on the union of two minimum spanning trees, for correlation networks to examine the change in the correlation structures of a gene set between two conditions and highlight influential genes (hubs). CONCLUSIONS: Package GSAR provides a set of multivariate non-parametric statistical methods that test a complex null hypothesis against specific alternatives. The methods in package GSAR are applicable to any type of omics data that can be represented in a matrix format. The package, with detailed instructions and examples, is freely available under the GPL (> = 2) license from the Bioconductor web site.

Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) is gradually replacing microarrays for high-throughput studies of gene expression. The main challenge of analyzing microarray data is not in finding differentially expressed genes, but in gaining insights into the biological processes underlying phenotypic differences. To interpret experimental results from microarrays, gene set analysis (GSA) has become the method of choice, in particular because it incorporates pre-existing biological knowledge (in a form of functionally related gene sets) into the analysis. Here we provide a brief review of several statistically different GSA approaches (competitive and self-contained) that can be adapted from microarrays practice as well as those specifically designed for RNA-seq. We evaluate their performance (in terms of Type I error rate, power, robustness to the sample size and heterogeneity, as well as the sensitivity to different types of selection biases) on simulated and real RNA-seq data. Not surprisingly, the performance of various GSA approaches depends only on the statistical hypothesis they test and does not depend on whether the test was developed for microarrays or RNA-seq data. Interestingly, we found that competitive methods have lower power as well as robustness to the samples heterogeneity than self-contained methods, leading to poor results reproducibility. We also found that the power of unsupervised competitive methods depends on the balance between up- and down-regulated genes in tested gene sets. These properties of competitive methods have been overlooked before. Our evaluation provides a concise guideline for selecting GSA approaches, best performing under particular experimental settings in the context of RNA-seq.

MOTIVATION: Data from RNA-seq experiments provide us with many new possibilities to gain insights into biological and disease mechanisms of cellular functioning. However, the reproducibility and robustness of RNA-seq data analysis results is often unclear. This is in part attributed to the two counter acting goals of (i) a cost efficient and (ii) an optimal experimental design leading to a compromise, e.g. in the sequencing depth of experiments. RESULTS: We introduce an R package called samExploreR that allows the subsampling (m out of n bootstraping) of short-reads based on SAM files facilitating the investigation of sequencing depth related questions for the experimental design. Overall, this provides a systematic way for exploring the reproducibility and robustness of general RNA-seq studies. We exemplify the usage of samExploreR by studying the influence of the sequencing depth and the annotation on the identification of differentially expressed genes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: samExploreR is available as an R package from Bioconductor. CONTACT: [email protected] information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: To date, gene set analysis approaches primarily focus on identifying differentially expressed gene sets (pathways). Methods for identifying differentially coexpressed pathways also exist but are mostly based on aggregated pairwise correlations or other pairwise measures of coexpression. Instead, we propose Gene Sets Net Correlations Analysis (GSNCA), a multivariate differential coexpression test that accounts for the complete correlation structure between genes. RESULTS: In GSNCA, weight factors are assigned to genes in proportion to the genes' cross-correlations (intergene correlations). The problem of finding the weight vectors is formulated as an eigenvector problem with a unique solution. GSNCA tests the null hypothesis that for a gene set there is no difference in the weight vectors of the genes between two conditions. In simulation studies and the analyses of experimental data, we demonstrate that GSNCA captures changes in the structure of genes' cross-correlations rather than differences in the averaged pairwise correlations. Thus, GSNCA infers differences in coexpression networks, however, bypassing method-dependent steps of network inference. As an additional result from GSNCA, we define hub genes as genes with the largest weights and show that these genes correspond frequently to major and specific pathway regulators, as well as to genes that are most affected by the biological difference between two conditions. In summary, GSNCA is a new approach for the analysis of differentially coexpressed pathways that also evaluates the importance of the genes in the pathways, thus providing unique information that may result in the generation of novel biological hypotheses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Implementation of the GSNCA test in R is available upon request from the authors.

Cancer is a complex disease that has proven to be difficult to understand on the single-gene level. For this reason a functional elucidation needs to take interactions among genes on a systems-level into account. In this study, we infer a colon cancer network from a large-scale gene expression data set by using the method BC3Net. We provide a structural and a functional analysis of this network and also connect its molecular interaction structure with the chromosomal locations of the genes enabling the definition of cis- and trans-interactions. Furthermore, we investigate the interaction of genes that can be found in close neighborhoods on the chromosomes to gain insight into regulatory mechanisms. To our knowledge this is the first study analyzing the genome-scale colon cancer network.

BACKGROUND: Over the last few years transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) has almost completely taken over microarrays for high-throughput studies of gene expression. Currently, the most popular use of RNA-Seq is to identify genes which are differentially expressed between two or more conditions. Despite the importance of Gene Set Analysis (GSA) in the interpretation of the results from RNA-Seq experiments, the limitations of GSA methods developed for microarrays in the context of RNA-Seq data are not well understood. RESULTS: We provide a thorough evaluation of popular multivariate and gene-level self-contained GSA approaches on simulated and real RNA-Seq data. The multivariate approach employs multivariate non-parametric tests combined with popular normalizations for RNA-Seq data. The gene-level approach utilizes univariate tests designed for the analysis of RNA-Seq data to find gene-specific P-values and combines them into a pathway P-value using classical statistical techniques. Our results demonstrate that the Type I error rate and the power of multivariate tests depend only on the test statistics and are insensitive to the different normalizations. In general standard multivariate GSA tests detect pathways that do not have any bias in terms of pathways size, percentage of differentially expressed genes, or average gene length in a pathway. In contrast the Type I error rate and the power of gene-level GSA tests are heavily affected by the methods for combining P-values, and all aforementioned biases are present in detected pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Our result emphasizes the importance of using self-contained non-parametric multivariate tests for detecting differentially expressed pathways for RNA-Seq data and warns against applying gene-level GSA tests, especially because of their high level of Type I error rates for both, simulated and real data.

MOTIVATION: The analysis of differentially expressed gene sets became a routine in the analyses of gene expression data. There is a multitude of tests available, ranging from aggregation tests that summarize gene-level statistics for a gene set to true multivariate tests, accounting for intergene correlations. Most of them detect complex departures from the null hypothesis but when the null hypothesis is rejected, the specific alternative leading to the rejection is not easily identifiable. RESULTS: In this article we compare the power and Type I error rates of minimum-spanning tree (MST)-based non-parametric multivariate tests with several multivariate and aggregation tests, which are frequently used for pathway analyses. In our simulation study, we demonstrate that MST-based tests have power that is for many settings comparable with the power of conventional approaches, but outperform them in specific regions of the parameter space corresponding to biologically relevant configurations. Further, we find for simulated and for gene expression data that MST-based tests discriminate well against shift and scale alternatives. As a general result, we suggest a two-step practical analysis strategy that may increase the interpretability of experimental data: first, apply the most powerful multivariate test to find the subset of pathways for which the null hypothesis is rejected and second, apply MST-based tests to these pathways to select those that support specific alternative hypotheses. CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Identification of differentially expressed pathways from expression data is an important problem because it allows us to gain insights into the functional working mechanism of cells beyond the detection of differentially expressed genes. In this paper we present a brief guide to methods for the pathway analysis of expression data. Despite the vast amount of different statistical methods that have been developed so far, there is a considerable similarity among them, allowing a systematic classification and a reduction to a few null hypotheses that are effectively tested. Systems biology aims to find emergent phenomena by the integration of heterogeneous data. In general, data integration itself is a part of any scientific inference: its elementary steps are the integration of observations (measurements) into the context of biological knowledge. However, in the case of systems biology, the scale of integration is many folds higher, resulting in a prodigious number of new computational approaches for the simultaneous analyses of heterogeneous data. In this paper we discuss one popular way of integrating biological knowledge into large-scale genome-wide measurements, namely the identification of functionally related genes (pathways) enriched or differentially expressed in gene expression data [1]. It should be noted that the approaches discussed are also applicable to the analyses of, e.g., RNA-seq, metabolomics or proteomics data and, generally, different types of biological measurements when preexisting biological knowledge is available. In the early stages of methodological developments for gene expression data analyses, most approaches were focused on producing so-called gene lists. This is a set of individual genes called differentially expressed as identified by univariate test statistics (e.g., a t-test) [2]–[4]. Instead, more recent approaches clearly reflect systems biology's trend of data integration and interpretation [5]–[7], focusing on sets of functionally related genes (e.g., from the same signaling or metabolic pathway) rather than individual genes. The purpose of this paper is to provide a brief guide to methods for the analysis of differentially expressed pathways or gene sets, which we simply call pathway-based methods. For this reason, we emphasize an illustration of the methods rather than their technical description. The reader is encouraged to follow the cited literature for technical details.

MOTIVATION: Very little attention has been given to gene selection procedures based on intergene correlation structure, which is often neglected in the context of differential gene expression analysis. We propose a statistical procedure to select genes that have different associations with others across different phenotypes. This procedure is based on a new gene association score, called the covariance distance. RESULTS: We apply the proposed method, along with two alternative methods, to several simulated datasets and find out that our method is much more powerful than the other two. For biological data, we demonstrate that the analysis of differentially associated genes complements the analysis of differentially expressed genes. Combining both procedures provides a more comprehensive functional interpretation of the experimental results. AVAILABILITY: The code is downloadable from http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/biostat/people/faculty/hu.cfm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: Recently, many univariate and several multivariate approaches have been suggested for testing differential expression of gene sets between different phenotypes. However, despite a wealth of literature studying their performance on simulated and real biological data, still there is a need to quantify their relative performance when they are testing different null hypotheses. RESULTS: In this article, we compare the performance of univariate and multivariate tests on both simulated and biological data. In the simulation study we demonstrate that high correlations equally affect the power of both, univariate as well as multivariate tests. In addition, for most of them the power is similarly affected by the dimensionality of the gene set and by the percentage of genes in the set, for which expression is changing between two phenotypes. The application of different test statistics to biological data reveals that three statistics (sum of squared t-tests, Hotelling's T(2), N-statistic), testing different null hypotheses, find some common but also some complementing differentially expressed gene sets under specific settings. This demonstrates that due to complementing null hypotheses each test projects on different aspects of the data and for the analysis of biological data it is beneficial to use all three tests simultaneously instead of focusing exclusively on just one.

BACKGROUND: Microarray technology is commonly used as a simple screening tool with a focus on selecting genes that exhibit extremely large differential expressions between different phenotypes. It lacks the ability to select genes that change their relationships with other genes in different biological conditions (differentially correlated genes). We intend to enrich the above procedure by proposing a nonparametric selection procedure that selects differentially correlated genes. RESULTS: Using both simulations and resampling techniques, we found that our procedure correctly detected genes that were not differentially expressed but differentially correlated. We also applied our procedure to a set of biological data and found some potentially important genes that were not selected by the traditional method. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Microarray technology yields multidimensional information on the function of the whole genome. Rather than treating intergene correlation as a nuisance to the traditional gene selection procedures which are essentially univariate, our method utilizes the rich information contained in the correlation as a new selection criterion. It can provide additional useful candidate genes for the biologists.

MOTIVATION: Many types of genomic data are naturally represented as binary vectors. Numerous tasks in computational biology can be cast as analysis of relationships between these vectors, and the first step is, frequently, to compute their pairwise distance matrix. Many distance measures have been proposed in the literature, but there is no theory justifying the choice of distance measure. RESULTS: We examine the approaches to measuring distances between binary vectors and study the characteristic properties of various distance measures and their performance in several tasks of genome analysis. Most distance measures between binary vectors turn out to belong to a single parametric family, namely generalized average-based distance with different exponents. We show that descriptive statistics of distance distribution, such as skewness and kurtosis, can guide the appropriate choice of the exponent. On the contrary, the more familiar distance properties, such as metric and additivity, appear to have much less effect on the performance of distances. AVAILABILITY: R code GADIST and Supplementary material are available at http://research.stowers-institute.org/bioinfo/

Attachment regions of the eukaryotic chromosomal DNA to the nuclear scaffold/matrix (S/MARs) participate in various important cellular processes. However, no obvious characteristics common for these nucleotide sequences have been revealed, except that S/MARs are non-coding sites containing putative regulatory elements and binding sites of DNA-topoisomerase II. Heterogeneity among S/MARs can be caused by a variety of biological factors. In this paper, the accuracy of two S/MARs prediction programs, MAR-Finder (Singh, Kramer and Krawetz, 1997) and ChrClass (Glazkov, Rogozin and Glazko, 1998) are compared and it is concluded that both programs can be recommended for analysis of eukaryotic genomes. However, results of their prediction should be interpreted with caution since estimation of prediction accuracy of both programs needs further analysis. Problems of S/MARs prediction are illustrated on several examples of human protein-coding genes, repeated elements and the beta-globin locus from different mammalian species. Results of our analysis suggest that the proportion of missed S/MARs is lower for ChrClass, whereas the proportion of wrong S/MARs is lower for MAR-Finder (a default set of parameters).