Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jouni Karvo
dblp:59/552
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Network performance modeling · 59% Physical-layer communications · 31% Internet architecture and protocols · 9% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications
importance sampling |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Network performance modeling › simulation modeling
monte carlo simulation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Network performance modeling › loss systems
blocking probability computation |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Network performance modeling
loss systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Internet architecture and protocols
multicast |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Network performance modeling › queueing analysis
queueing models of computer systems |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast Networks · INFOCOM 2001 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 0.0inverse convolution · 0.0importance sampling · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 | Quantitative performance comparison of different content distribution modes
Samuli Aalto, Janne Aaltonen, Jouni Karvo |
Perform. Evaluation | 3 |
| 2002 | Efficient Simulation of Blocking Probabilities for Multi-layer Multicast Streams
Jouni Karvo |
NETWORKING | 1 |
| 2001 | Efficient Importance Sampling for Monte Carlo Simulation of Multicast NetworksabstractWe consider the problem of estimating blocking probabilities in a multicast loss system via simulation, applying the static Monte Carlo method with importance sampling. An approach is introduced where the original estimation problem is first decomposed into independent simpler sub-problems, each roughly corresponding to estimating the blocking probability contribution from a single link. Then we apply importance sampling to solve each sub-problem. The importance sampling distribution is the original distribution conditioned on that the state is in the blocking state region of a single link. Samples can be generated from this distribution using the so called inverse convolution method. Finally, a dynamic control algorithm is used for optimally allocating the samples between different sub-problems. The numerical results demonstrate that the variance reduction obtained with the method is remarkable, between 400 and 36000 in the considered examples. Pasi E. Lassila, Jouni Karvo, Jorma T. Virtamo |
INFOCOM | 2 |
| 2001 | Notes on the Per-Flow Packet Count Flow ClassifierabstractTo realize a packet count classifier, in addition to the active flow table, a candidate table is needed, where information on flow candidates is kept. We observe the temporal behavior of both the active flow table and flow candidate table size using actual traffic traces. The results indicate that the performance bottleneck in a packet count classifier lies within the candidate table management. Also, the changes in the candidate table size occur much faster than in the active flow table. Therefore, fast methods of creating entries and deletions in the candidate table are needed. Mika Ilvesmäki, Jouni Karvo |
LCN | 2 |