Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nikolaos P. Nikolaou

dblp:59/6224 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2004
0000-0003-2753-2309ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 38% Image and video processing · 38% Image and video coding · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image analysis
image comparison
0.012004
Efficient computation of the Hutchinson metric between digitized images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2004
Image and video coding
image compression
0.012004
Efficient computation of the Hutchinson metric between digitized images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2004
Image and video coding
image quality assessment
0.012004
Efficient computation of the Hutchinson metric between digitized images · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

hutchinson metric computation · 0.0digitized screen projection · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2004 Efficient computation of the Hutchinson metric between digitized images
abstract
The Hutchinson metric is a natural measure of the discrepancy between two images for use in fractal image processing. An efficient solution to the problem of computing the Hutchinson metric between two arbitrary digitized images is considered. The technique proposed here, based on the shape of the objects as projected on the digitized screen, can be used as an effective way to establish the error between the original and the, possibly compressed, decoded image. To test the performance of our method, we apply it to compare pairs of fractal objects, as well as to compare real-world images with the corresponding reconstructed ones.
Vasileios Drakopoulos, Nikolaos P. Nikolaou
IEEE Trans. Image Process.2