Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page
Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert

Nancy A. Botten

dblp:59/6602 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1994
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorComputer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Requirements engineering and software design › software process
software process assessment		 0.011994
Development process assessment toward leading edge quality · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994
Software maintenance and evolution
software process improvement		 0.011994
Development process assessment toward leading edge quality · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1994

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fuzzy set · 0.0decision making · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1994 Development process assessment toward leading edge quality
abstract
The development process assessments conducted at the Westlake Programming Lab (WPL) are described and the results summarized. An approach for merging and prioritizing the multiple assessment data, based on the Yager (1981) method of decision making using fuzzy sets, is described. A matrix that identifies action items in the unified action plan is presented. Finally, a simplified example is used to illustrate the techniques.>
Nancy A. Botten
 IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1
1992 Complex Knowledge Base Verification Using Matrices
Nancy A. Botten
 IEA/AIE1
1992 The knowledge base partitioning problem: Mathematical formulation and heuristic clustering
Tzvi Raz, Nancy A. Botten
 Data Knowl. Eng.2