EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Srinivas Chennupaty
dblp:59/8277
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2010
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 61% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 30% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU · ISCA 2010 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU · ISCA 2010 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
throughput computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2010 | Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU · ISCA 2010 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
chip multiprocessor |
0.0 | 1 | 2010 | Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPU · ISCA 2010 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
performance analysis · 0.1optimization techniques · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Debunking the 100X GPU vs. CPU myth: an evaluation of throughput computing on CPU and GPUabstractRecent advances in computing have led to an explosion in the amount of data being generated. Processing the ever-growing data in a timely manner has made throughput computing an important aspect for emerging applications. Our analysis of a set of important throughput computing kernels shows that there is an ample amount of parallelism in these kernels which makes them suitable for today's multi-core CPUs and GPUs. In the past few years there have been many studies claiming GPUs deliver substantial speedups (between 10X and 1000X) over multi-core CPUs on these kernels. To understand where such large performance difference comes from, we perform a rigorous performance analysis and find that after applying optimizations appropriate for both CPUs and GPUs the performance gap between an Nvidia GTX280 processor and the Intel Core i7-960 processor narrows to only 2.5x on average. In this paper, we discuss optimization techniques for both CPU and GPU, analyze what architecture features contributed to performance differences between the two architectures, and recommend a set of architectural features which provide significant improvement in architectural efficiency for throughput kernels. Victor W. Lee, Changkyu Kim, Jatin Chhugani, Michael Deisher, Daehyun Kim 0001, Anthony D. Nguyen, Nadathur Satish, Mikhail Smelyanskiy, Srinivas Chennupaty, Per Hammarlund, Ronak Singhal, Pradeep Dubey |
ISCA | 9 |