Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Braden Stenning

dblp:59/9635 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Robot navigation and mapping · 62% 3D vision · 38%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › visual navigation
visual teach and repeat
0.112012
Visual Teach and Repeat using appearance-based lidar · ICRA 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision › photometric analysis
photometric invariance
0.012012
Visual Teach and Repeat using appearance-based lidar · ICRA 2012
Computer vision › 3D vision
visual localization
0.012012
Visual Teach and Repeat using appearance-based lidar · ICRA 2012

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

laser scanner · 0.1appearance-based technique · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Visual Teach and Repeat using appearance-based lidar
abstract
Visual Teach and Repeat (VT&R) has proven to be an effective method to allow a vehicle to autonomously repeat any previously driven route without the need for a global positioning system. One of the major challenges for a method that relies on visual input to recognize previously visited places is lighting change, as this can make the appearance of a scene look drastically different. For this reason, passive sensors, such as cameras, are not ideal for outdoor environments with inconsistent/inadequate light. However, camera-based systems have been very successful for localization and mapping in outdoor, unstructured terrain, which can be largely attributed to the use of sparse, appearance-based computer vision techniques. Thus, in an effort to achieve lighting invariance and to continue to exploit the heritage of the appearance-based vision techniques traditionally used with cameras, this paper presents the first VT&R system that uses appearance-based techniques with laser scanners for motion estimation. The system has been field tested in a planetary analogue environment for an entire diurnal cycle, covering more than 11km with an autonomy rate of 99.7% of the distance traveled.
Colin McManus, Paul Timothy Furgale, Braden Stenning, Tim D. Barfoot
ICRA3
2010 Path planning with variable-fidelity terrain assessment
abstract
Terrain assessment and path planning are intrinsically linked. There exist a variety of terrain-assessment algorithms and these methods follow the trend of low-fidelity at low-cost and high-fidelity at high-cost. We present a modular path-planning algorithm that uses a hierarchy of terrain-assessment methods; from low-fidelity to high-fidelity. Using all the available sensor data, the visible terrain is assessed with the low-fidelity, low-cost method. The decision to assess a piece of terrain with the high-fidelity, high-cost method is made considering potential path benefits and the cost of assessment. The result is a lower combined cost of the path and terrain assessment that exploits the capabilities of the robot chassis where prudent. We demonstrate the technique on a large number of simulated path-planning problems using fractal terrain, as well as provide preliminary results from an experimental field test carried out on Devon Island, Canada.
Braden Stenning, Tim D. Barfoot
IROS1