Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Leah S. Larkey

dblp:60/1317 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 7 · 6 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers
Information retrieval · 76% Data mining · 24%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computing education · 57% Medical and health informatics · 43%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › information filtering
topic tracking
0.012004
Language-specific models in multilingual topic tracking · SIGIR 2004
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.021998
Automatic Essay Grading Using Text Categorization Techniques · SIGIR 1998
Combining Classifiers in Text Categorization · SIGIR 1996
Information retrieval › cross-language information retrieval
arabic retrieval
0.012002
Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: light stemming and co-occurrence analysis · SIGIR 2002
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval
0.012002
Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: light stemming and co-occurrence analysis · SIGIR 2002
Information retrieval › text analysis
automated essay scoring
0.011998
Automatic Essay Grading Using Text Categorization Techniques · SIGIR 1998
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning
0.011996
Combining Classifiers in Text Categorization · SIGIR 1996
Information retrieval › indexing
stemming
0.012002
Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: light stemming and co-occurrence analysis · SIGIR 2002
Computing education
automated assessment
0.011998
Automatic Essay Grading Using Text Categorization Techniques · SIGIR 1998

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

naive bayes · 0.1k-nearest neighbor · 0.1machine translation · 0.0linear regression · 0.0morphological analysis · 0.0co-occurrence analysis · 0.0relevance feedback · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2005 Structured queries, language modeling, and relevance modeling in cross-language information retrieval
Leah S. Larkey, Margaret E. Connell
Inf. Process. Manag.1
2004 Language-specific models in multilingual topic tracking
abstract
Topic tracking is complicated when the stories in the stream occur in multiple languages. Typically, researchers have trained only English topic models because the training stories have been provided in English. In tracking, non-English test stories are then machine translated into English to compare them with the topic models. We propose a native language hypothesis stating that comparisons would be more effective in the original language of the story. We first test and support the hypothesis for story link detection. For topic tracking the hypothesis implies that it should be preferable to build separate language-specific topic models for each language in the stream. We compare different methods of incrementally building such native language topic models.
Leah S. Larkey, Fangfang Feng, Margaret E. Connell, Victor Lavrenko
SIGIR1
2003 Statistical transliteration for english-arabic cross language information retrieval
abstract
Out of vocabulary (OOV) words are problematic for cross language information retrieval. One way to deal with OOV words when the two languages have different alphabets, is to transliterate the unknown words, that is, to render them in the orthography of the second language. In the present study, we present a simple statistical technique to train an English to Arabic transliteration model from pairs of names. We call this a selected n-gram model because a two-stage training procedure first learns which n-gram segments should be added to the unigram inventory for the source language, and then a second stage learns the translation model over this inventory. This technique requires no heuristics or linguistic knowledge of either language. We evaluate the statistically-trained model and a simpler hand-crafted model on a test set of named entities from the Arabic AFP corpus and demonstrate that they perform better than two online translation sources. We also explore the effectiveness of these systems on the TREC 2002 cross language IR task. We find that transliteration either of OOV named entities or of all OOV words is an effective approach for cross language IR.
Nasreen Abdul Jaleel, Leah S. Larkey
CIKM2
2003 Hindi CLIR in thirty days
abstract
As participants in the TIDES Surprise language exercise, researchers at the University of Massachusetts helped collect Hindi--English resources and developed a cross-language information retrieval system. Components included normalization, stop-word removal, transliteration, structured query translation, and language modeling using a probabilistic dictionary derived from a parallel corpus. Existing technology was successfully applied to Hindi. The biggest stumbling blocks were collection of parallel English and Hindi text and dealing with numerous proprietary encodings.
Leah S. Larkey, Margaret E. Connell, Nasreen Abdul Jaleel
ACM Trans. Asian Lang. Inf. Process.1
2002 Improving stemming for Arabic information retrieval: light stemming and co-occurrence analysis
abstract
Arabic, a highly inflected language, requires good stemming for effective information retrieval, yet no standard approach to stemming has emerged. We developed several light stemmers based on heuristics and a statistical stemmer based on co-occurrence for Arabic retrieval. We compared the retrieval effectiveness of our stemmers and of a morphological analyzer on the TREC-2001 data. The best light stemmer was more effective for cross-language retrieval than a morphological stemmer which tried to find the root for each word. A repartitioning process consisting of vowel removal followed by clustering using co-occurrence analysis produced stem classes which were better than no stemming or very light stemming, but still inferior to good light stemming or morphological analysis.
Leah S. Larkey, Lisa Ballesteros, Margaret E. Connell
SIGIR1
2000 Collection Selection and Results Merging with Topically Organized U.S. Patents and TREC Data
abstract
We investigate three issues in distributed information retrieval, considering both TREC data and U.S. Patents: (1) topical organization of large text collections, (2) collection ranking and selection with topically organized collections (3) results merging, particularly document score normalization, with topically organized collections. We find that it is better to organize collections topically, and that topical collections can be well ranked using either INQUERY's CORI algorithm, or the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KL), but KL is far worse than CORI for non-topically organized collections. For results merging, collections organized by topic require global idfs for the best performance. Contrary to results found elsewhere, normalized scores are not as good as global idfs for merging when the collections are topically organized. Keywords Information retrieval, Collection selection, Topical organization. 1. INTRODUCTION We have developed a distributed system for the search and class...
Leah S. Larkey, Margaret E. Connell, Jamie Callan
CIKM1
1998 Automatic Essay Grading Using Text Categorization Techniques
abstract
Several standard text-categorization techniques were applied to the problem of automated essay grading.Bayesian independence classifiers and knearest-neighbor classifiers were trained to assign scores to manually-graded essays.These scores were combined with several other summary text measures using linear regression.The classifiers and regression equations were then applied to a new set of essays.The classifiers worked very well.The agreement between the automated grader and the final manual grade was as good as the agreement between human graders.
Leah S. Larkey
SIGIR1
1996 Combining Classifiers in Text Categorization
abstract
Three different types of classifiers were investigated in the context of a text categorization problem in the medical domain: the automatic assignment of ICD9 codes to dictated inpatient discharge summaries. K-nearest-neighbor, relevance feedback, and Bayesian independence classifers were applied individually and in combination. A combination of different classifiers produced better results than any single type of classifier. For this specific medical categorization problem, new query formulation and weighting methods used in the k-nearest-neighbor classifier improved performance. 1 Introduction Past research in information retrieval has shown that one can improve retrieval effectiveness by using multiple representations in indexing and query formulation [27] [19] [3] [11] and by using multiple search strategies [5] [24] [7]. In this work, we investigate whether we can attain similar improvements in the domain of text categorization by combining different representations and classif...
Leah S. Larkey, W. Bruce Croft
SIGIR1