Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jignashu Parikh

dblp:60/1876 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2006
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 63% Data mining · 30% Query processing and optimization · 8%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
query logs
0.112006
Unity: relevance feedback using user query logs · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval
query processing
0.112006
Unity: relevance feedback using user query logs · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval › query reformulation
query refinement
0.112006
Unity: relevance feedback using user query logs · SIGIR 2006
Information retrieval
relevance feedback
0.112006
Unity: relevance feedback using user query logs · SIGIR 2006
Data mining › clustering
document clustering
0.012004
Document preprocessing for naive Bayes classification and clustering with mixture of multinomials · KDD 2004
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
naive bayes
0.012004
Document preprocessing for naive Bayes classification and clustering with mixture of multinomials · KDD 2004
Data mining › text mining
text classification
0.012004
Document preprocessing for naive Bayes classification and clustering with mixture of multinomials · KDD 2004
Information retrieval › query understanding
query clustering
0.012002
Plan Selection Based on Query Clustering · VLDB 2002
Query processing and optimization › query planning
query plan selection
0.012002
Plan Selection Based on Query Clustering · VLDB 2002
Information retrieval › text analysis
text preprocessing
0.012004
Document preprocessing for naive Bayes classification and clustering with mixture of multinomials · KDD 2004

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user query log mining · 0.1normalization · 0.0log transformation · 0.0IDF · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2006 Unity: relevance feedback using user query logs
abstract
The exponential growth of the Web and the increasing ability of web search engines to index data have led to a problem of plenty. The number of results returned per query is typically in the order of millions of documents for many common queries. Although there is the benefit of added coverage for every query, the problem of ranking these documents and giving the best results gets worse. The problem is even more difficult in case of temporal and ambiguous queries. We try to address this problem using feedback from user query logs. We leverage a technology called Units for generating query refinements which are shown as Also try queries on Yahoo! Search. We consider these refinements as sub-concepts which help define user intent and use them to improve search relevance. The results obtained via live testing on Yahoo! Search are encouraging.
Jignashu Parikh, Shyam Kapur
SIGIR1
2004 Document preprocessing for naive Bayes classification and clustering with mixture of multinomials
abstract
Naive Bayes classifier has long been used for text categorization tasks. Its sibling from the unsupervised world, the probabilistic mixture of multinomial models, has likewise been successfully applied to text clustering problems. Despite the strong independence assumptions that these models make, their attractiveness come from low computational cost, relatively low memory consumption, ability to handle heterogeneous features and multiple classes, and often competitiveness with the top of the line models. Recently, there has been several attempts to alleviate the problems of Naive Bayes by performing heuristic feature transformations, such as IDF, normalization by the length of the documents and taking the logarithms of the counts. We justify the use of these techniques and apply them to two problems: classification of products in Yahoo! Shopping and clustering the vectors of collocated terms in user queries to Yahoo! Search. The experimental evaluation allows us to draw conclusions about the promise that these transformations carry with regard to alleviating the strong assumptions of the multinomial model.
Dmitry Pavlov, Ramnath Balasubramanyan, Byron Dom, Shyam Kapur, Jignashu Parikh
KDD5
2002 Plan Selection Based on Query Clustering
Antara Ghosh, Jignashu Parikh, Vibhuti S. Sengar, Jayant R. Haritsa
VLDB2
2001 Interlingua-based English-Hindi Machine Translation and Language Divergence
Shachi Dave, Jignashu Parikh, Pushpak Bhattacharyya
Mach. Transl.2