Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Smith Tsang

dblp:60/3304 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification
0.222011
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning
0.222011
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
uncertain data classification
0.112011
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011
Data mining
uncertain data mining
0.112009
Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 0.3decision tree induction · 0.2probability density function · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Decision Trees for Uncertain Data
abstract
Traditional decision tree classifiers work with data whose values are known and precise. We extend such classifiers to handle data with uncertain information. Value uncertainty arises in many applications during the data collection process. Example sources of uncertainty include measurement/quantization errors, data staleness, and multiple repeated measurements. With uncertainty, the value of a data item is often represented not by one single value, but by multiple values forming a probability distribution. Rather than abstracting uncertain data by statistical derivatives (such as mean and median), we discover that the accuracy of a decision tree classifier can be much improved if the "complete information” of a data item (taking into account the probability density function (pdf)) is utilized. We extend classical decision tree building algorithms to handle data tuples with uncertain values. Extensive experiments have been conducted which show that the resulting classifiers are more accurate than those using value averages. Since processing pdfs is computationally more costly than processing single values (e.g., averages), decision tree construction on uncertain data is more CPU demanding than that for certain data. To tackle this problem, we propose a series of pruning techniques that can greatly improve construction efficiency.
Smith Tsang, Ben Kao, Kevin Y. Yip, Wai-Shing Ho, Sau Dan Lee
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2009 Decision Trees for Uncertain Data
abstract
Traditional decision tree classifiers work with data whose values are known and precise. We extend such classifiers to handle data with uncertain information, which originates from measurement/quantisation errors, data staleness, multiple repeated measurements, etc. The value uncertainty is represented by multiple values forming a probability distribution function (pdf). We discover that the accuracy of a decision tree classifier can be much improved if the whole pdf, rather than a simple statistic, is taken into account. We extend classical decision tree building algorithms to handle data tuples with uncertain values. Since processing pdf's is computationally more costly, we propose a series of pruning techniques that can greatly improve the efficiency of the construction of decision trees.
Smith Tsang, Ben Kao, Kevin Y. Yip, Wai-Shing Ho, Sau Dan Lee
ICDE1