Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Smith Tsang
dblp:60/3304
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011 Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning |
0.2 | 2 | 2011 | Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011 Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
uncertain data classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2011 |
Data mining
uncertain data mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Decision Trees for Uncertain Data · ICDE 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
pruning · 0.3decision tree induction · 0.2probability density function · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Decision Trees for Uncertain DataabstractTraditional decision tree classifiers work with data whose values are known and precise. We extend such classifiers to handle data with uncertain information. Value uncertainty arises in many applications during the data collection process. Example sources of uncertainty include measurement/quantization errors, data staleness, and multiple repeated measurements. With uncertainty, the value of a data item is often represented not by one single value, but by multiple values forming a probability distribution. Rather than abstracting uncertain data by statistical derivatives (such as mean and median), we discover that the accuracy of a decision tree classifier can be much improved if the "complete information” of a data item (taking into account the probability density function (pdf)) is utilized. We extend classical decision tree building algorithms to handle data tuples with uncertain values. Extensive experiments have been conducted which show that the resulting classifiers are more accurate than those using value averages. Since processing pdfs is computationally more costly than processing single values (e.g., averages), decision tree construction on uncertain data is more CPU demanding than that for certain data. To tackle this problem, we propose a series of pruning techniques that can greatly improve construction efficiency. Smith Tsang, Ben Kao, Kevin Y. Yip, Wai-Shing Ho, Sau Dan Lee |
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. | 1 |
| 2009 | Decision Trees for Uncertain DataabstractTraditional decision tree classifiers work with data whose values are known and precise. We extend such classifiers to handle data with uncertain information, which originates from measurement/quantisation errors, data staleness, multiple repeated measurements, etc. The value uncertainty is represented by multiple values forming a probability distribution function (pdf). We discover that the accuracy of a decision tree classifier can be much improved if the whole pdf, rather than a simple statistic, is taken into account. We extend classical decision tree building algorithms to handle data tuples with uncertain values. Since processing pdf's is computationally more costly, we propose a series of pruning techniques that can greatly improve the efficiency of the construction of decision trees. Smith Tsang, Ben Kao, Kevin Y. Yip, Wai-Shing Ho, Sau Dan Lee |
ICDE | 1 |