Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sam Howry

dblp:60/3862 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Operating systems › resource management › memory management
dynamic memory allocation
0.011971
A Multiprogramming System for Control · SOSP 1971
Operating systems › resource management › process management
multiprogramming
0.011971
A Multiprogramming System for Control · SOSP 1971
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical system platforms
0.011971
A Multiprogramming System for Control · SOSP 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system design · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 A Multiprogramming System for Control
abstract
This paper describes an operational small computer multiprogramming system developed for the control of the Stanford Two Mile Linear Accelerator (SLAC). The system has many features of larger systems such as dynamic memory allocation and interprocess control, but does not have to handle typical batch type jobs which need large arrays and many other system resources. This difference results in a drastic reduction in the complexity of both design and implementation. The accelerator control problem is discussed in terms of what requirements are imposed on the system by the environment. Then the basic subsystems are described with sufficient examples to show the reader other areas where such a system may be applicable.
Sam Howry
SOSP1