Multiple sequence alignment is an important problem in the biosciences. To date, most multiple alignment systems have employed a tree-based algorithm, which combines the results of two-way dynamic programming in a tree-like order of sequence similarity. The alignment quality is not, however, high enough when the sequence similarity is low. Once an error occurs in the alignment process, that error can never be corrected. Recently, an effective new class of algorithms has been developed. These algorithms iteratively apply dynamic programming to partially aligned sequences to improve their alignment quality. The iteration corrects any errors that may have occurred in the alignment process. Such an iterative strategy requires heuristic search methods to solve practical alignment problems. Incorporating such methods yields various iterative algorithms. This paper reports our comprehensive comparison of iterative algorithms. We proved that performance improves remarkably when using a tree-based iterative method, which iteratively refines an alignment whenever two subalignments are merged in a tree-based way. We propose a tree-dependent, restricted partitioning technique to efficiently reduce the execution time of iterative algorithms.

A multiple alignment methodology that can produce high-quality alignment is extremely important for predicting the structure of unknown proteins. Nearly all the methodologies developed so far have employed two-way alignment only. Although these methods are fast, the alignments they produce lose reliability as the similarity of sequences reduces. We developed the MASCOT multiple alignment system. MASCOT can sustain the reliability of alignment even when the similarity of sequences is low. MASCOT achieves high-quality alignment by employing three-way alignment in addition to two-way alignment. The resultant alignments are refined by simulated annealing to higher quality. We also use a cluster analysis of sequences to produce highly reliable alignments.

We have developed simulated annealing algorithms to solve the problem of multiple sequence alignment. The algorithm was shown to give the optimal solution as confirmed by the rigorous dynamic programming algorithm for three-sequence alignment. To overcome long execution times for simulated annealing, we utilized a parallel computer. A sequential algorithm, a simple parallel algorithm and the temperature parallel algorithm were tested on a problem. The results were compared with the result obtained by a conventional tree-based algorithm where alignments were merged by two-way dynamic programming. Every annealing algorithm produced a better energy value than the conventional algorithm. The best energy value, which probably represents the optimal solution, was reached within a reasonable time by both of the parallel annealing algorithms. We consider the temperature parallel algorithm of simulated annealing to be the most suitable for finding the optimal multiple sequence alignment because the algorithm does not require any scheduling for optimization. The algorithm is also useful for refining multiple alignments obtained by other heuristic methods.