Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
E. James Harner
dblp:60/4935
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computing education
software engineering education |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | A Formal Approach to Component-Based Software Engineering: Education and Evaluation · ICSE 2001 |
Requirements engineering and software design › software architecture
component-based software engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2001 | A Formal Approach to Component-Based Software Engineering: Education and Evaluation · ICSE 2001 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Random KNN feature selection - a fast and stable alternative to Random ForestsabstractBACKGROUND: Successfully modeling high-dimensional data involving thousands of variables is challenging. This is especially true for gene expression profiling experiments, given the large number of genes involved and the small number of samples available. Random Forests (RF) is a popular and widely used approach to feature selection for such "small n, large p problems." However, Random Forests suffers from instability, especially in the presence of noisy and/or unbalanced inputs. RESULTS: We present RKNN-FS, an innovative feature selection procedure for "small n, large p problems." RKNN-FS is based on Random KNN (RKNN), a novel generalization of traditional nearest-neighbor modeling. RKNN consists of an ensemble of base k-nearest neighbor models, each constructed from a random subset of the input variables. To rank the importance of the variables, we define a criterion on the RKNN framework, using the notion of support. A two-stage backward model selection method is then developed based on this criterion. Empirical results on microarray data sets with thousands of variables and relatively few samples show that RKNN-FS is an effective feature selection approach for high-dimensional data. RKNN is similar to Random Forests in terms of classification accuracy without feature selection. However, RKNN provides much better classification accuracy than RF when each method incorporates a feature-selection step. Our results show that RKNN is significantly more stable and more robust than Random Forests for feature selection when the input data are noisy and/or unbalanced. Further, RKNN-FS is much faster than the Random Forests feature selection method (RF-FS), especially for large scale problems, involving thousands of variables and multiple classes. CONCLUSIONS: Given the superiority of Random KNN in classification performance when compared with Random Forests, RKNN-FS's simplicity and ease of implementation, and its superiority in speed and stability, we propose RKNN-FS as a faster and more stable alternative to Random Forests in classification problems involving feature selection for high-dimensional datasets. Shengqiao Li, E. James Harner, Donald A. Adjeroh |
BMC Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2010 | Algorithm for haplotype resolution and block partitioning for partial XOR-genotype data
Nadezhda Sazonova, Edward Sazonov, E. James Harner |
J. Biomed. Informatics | 3 |
| 2001 | A Formal Approach to Component-Based Software Engineering: Education and EvaluationabstractSummarizes an approach for introducing component-based software engineering (CBSE) early in the undergraduate computer science curriculum, and an evaluation of the impact of the approach at two institutions. Principles taught include a modular style of software development, an emphasis on human understanding of component behavior even while using formal specifications, and the importance of maintainability, as well as classical issues such as efficiency analysis and reasoning. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of student outcomes and end-to-end changes in student attitudes show mostly positive results that are statistically significant, confirming that: (1) it is possible to teach CBSE principles without displacing "classical" principles usually taught in introductory courses, (2) students can understand and reuse formally specified components without knowing their implementations, and (3) student attitudes towards software engineering can be altered in directions heretofore often assumed to be difficult to achieve. Murali Sitaraman, Timothy J. Long, Bruce W. Weide, E. James Harner |
ICSE | 4 |