MOTIVATION: Genome-wide maps of epigenetic modifications are powerful resources for non-coding genome annotation. Maps of multiple epigenetics marks have been integrated into cell or tissue type-specific chromatin state annotations for many cell or tissue types. With the increasing availability of multiple chromatin state maps for biologically similar samples, there is a need for methods that can effectively summarize the information about chromatin state annotations within groups of samples and identify differences across groups of samples at a high resolution. RESULTS: We developed CSREP, which takes as input chromatin state annotations for a group of samples. CSREP then probabilistically estimates the state at each genomic position and derives a representative chromatin state map for the group. CSREP uses an ensemble of multi-class logistic regression classifiers that predict the chromatin state assignment of each sample given the state maps from all other samples. The difference in CSREP's probability assignments for the two groups can be used to identify genomic locations with differential chromatin state assignments. Using groups of chromatin state maps of a diverse set of cell and tissue types, we demonstrate the advantages of using CSREP to summarize chromatin state maps and identify biologically relevant differences between groups at a high resolution. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The CSREP source code and generated data are available at http://github.com/ernstlab/csrep. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

MOTIVATION: Expressed Sequence Tags (ESTs) are next to cDNA sequences as the most direct way to locate in silico the genes of the genome and determine their structure. Currently ESTs make up more than 60% of all the database entries. The goal of this work is the development of a new program called DNA Intelligent Analysis for ESTs (DIANA-EST) based on a combination of Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and statistics for the characterization of the coding regions within ESTs and the reconstruction of the encoded protein. RESULTS: 89.7% of the nucleotides from an independent test set with 127 ESTs were predicted correctly as to whether they are coding or non coding. AVAILABILITY: The program is available upon request from the author. CONTACT: Present address: Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, School of Medicine, 475 Clinical Research Building, 415 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6145, USA. [email protected].