Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kestutis Ivinskis

dblp:60/5497 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 56% Cloud and datacenter computing · 44%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
high availability
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995
Cloud and datacenter computing › resource management
workload management
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995
Cloud and datacenter computing
workload shifting
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
client-server systems
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995
Distributed systems › distributed system architecture
multi-tier architecture
0.011995
High Availability of Commercial Applications · SIGMOD Conference 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workload balancing · 0.0replication · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 High Availability of Commercial Applications
abstract
The increased performance capabilities of UNIX server systems have led to their acceptance as the server of choice for medium-sized and large organizations. But performance is just one facet. Another facet is the end user perception of the availability of an information system.Traditional mainframe based IS shops have a long experience in supplying computing services to their commercial end users. The ultimate goal of the end user is to have no downtimes for his work at his PC or workstation terminal. Key issues related to system availability in client/server based information systems remain the same as in the mainframe based world, e.g. system responsiveness, maximum downtime per year and maximum number of system outages per year. But there are also new aspects, which have been introduced into the discussion.In a multi-tiered client/server based information system the OLTP workload is distributed on different servers. Hence one can ask: Why should a failure of one server automatically imply downtime for the whole system ? Can't most of the system continue to operate ? Redistribution of the workload on the remaining active servers can be used to attack this problem. Workload balancing can be applied for replicated system services. Other techniques have to be applied for non-replicated system services.This paper considers client/server based applications running in a local or wide area network of computers in a distributed system.
Kestutis Ivinskis
SIGMOD Conference1